Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: re-enable rc6 for ironlake

2011-04-28 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:49:40PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:03:14 +0100 Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote: We should probably just enable fbc on the pipe connected to the internal panel (if any) and keep it disabled otherwise. On Arrandale, fbc is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: re-enable rc6 for ironlake

2011-04-27 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:12:48 -0700, Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote: The previous patches should fix enough of the known issues to try re-enabling rc6 for general consumption Yay, and they bring back the old bugs! :) So upon enabling fbc on a 2560x1440 external panel, it goes blank again.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: re-enable rc6 for ironlake

2011-04-27 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:49:28 +0100 Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:12:48 -0700, Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote: The previous patches should fix enough of the known issues to try re-enabling rc6 for general consumption Yay, and they bring back the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: re-enable rc6 for ironlake

2011-04-27 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:03:14 +0100 Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote: We should probably just enable fbc on the pipe connected to the internal panel (if any) and keep it disabled otherwise. On Arrandale, fbc is potentially a bigger win than rc6 - but is also a potential loss -

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: re-enable rc6 for ironlake

2011-03-18 Thread Ben Widawsky
The previous patches should fix enough of the known issues to try re-enabling rc6 for general consumption Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c