Re: [Intel-gfx] FW: Wrt golden MMIO/CFG snaphot in GVT-g

2016-06-15 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Joonas Lahtinen [mailto:joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 5:23 PM > > On pe, 2016-06-03 at 12:36 +, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > > > > > From: Joonas Lahtinen [mailto:joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com] > > > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:32 PM > > > > > > On pe,

Re: [Intel-gfx] FW: Wrt golden MMIO/CFG snaphot in GVT-g

2016-06-08 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On pe, 2016-06-03 at 12:36 +, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > > > From: Joonas Lahtinen [mailto:joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com] > > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:32 PM > > > > On pe, 2016-05-27 at 10:05 +, Wang, Zhi A wrote: > > > > > > For me I think maybe i915 could save the snapshot for GVT, t

Re: [Intel-gfx] FW: Wrt golden MMIO/CFG snaphot in GVT-g

2016-06-03 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Joonas Lahtinen [mailto:joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:32 PM > > On pe, 2016-05-27 at 10:05 +, Wang, Zhi A wrote: > > For me I think maybe i915 could save the snapshot for GVT, then GVT-g > > patch the snapshot itself, then there won’t be leaking happen

Re: [Intel-gfx] FW: Wrt golden MMIO/CFG snaphot in GVT-g

2016-06-01 Thread Zhiyuan Lv
Hi Joonas, On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:49:59PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On ti, 2016-05-31 at 22:01 +0800, Zhiyuan Lv wrote: > > Hi Joonas, > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:32:25PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > > > > > On pe, 2016-05-27 at 10:05 +, Wang, Zhi A wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] FW: Wrt golden MMIO/CFG snaphot in GVT-g

2016-06-01 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On ti, 2016-05-31 at 22:01 +0800, Zhiyuan Lv wrote: > Hi Joonas, > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:32:25PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > > > On pe, 2016-05-27 at 10:05 +, Wang, Zhi A wrote: > > > > > > For me I think maybe i915 could save the snapshot for GVT, then GVT-g  > > > patch the sn

Re: [Intel-gfx] FW: Wrt golden MMIO/CFG snaphot in GVT-g

2016-05-31 Thread Zhiyuan Lv
Hi Joonas, On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:32:25PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On pe, 2016-05-27 at 10:05 +, Wang, Zhi A wrote: > > For me I think maybe i915 could save the snapshot for GVT, then GVT-g > > patch the snapshot itself, then there won’t be leaking happened I > > think. Even we wro

Re: [Intel-gfx] FW: Wrt golden MMIO/CFG snaphot in GVT-g

2016-05-27 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On pe, 2016-05-27 at 10:05 +, Wang, Zhi A wrote: > For me I think maybe i915 could save the snapshot for GVT, then GVT-g > patch the snapshot itself, then there won’t be leaking happened I > think. Even we wrote a dedicated little program, we would do the same > thing. >   > From: Wang, Zhi A 

[Intel-gfx] FW: Wrt golden MMIO/CFG snaphot in GVT-g

2016-05-27 Thread Wang, Zhi A
For me I think maybe i915 could save the snapshot for GVT, then GVT-g patch the snapshot itself, then there won't be leaking happened I think. Even we wrote a dedicated little program, we would do the same thing. From: Wang, Zhi A Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 12:59 PM To: joonas.lahti...@linux.int