Re: [Intel-gfx] Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1

2018-01-02 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Hello, > > TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY > > Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the following patches failed to cleanly > backport to v4.15-rc1, if you believe they still are valid patches to >

Re: [Intel-gfx] Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1

2017-12-05 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2017.12.05 17:02:34 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Dropping GVT folks that are not affected. > > Keeping Zhenyu and Zhi as a heads-up, there's no need for GVT pull for this > rc? > I need to backport one from -next once it's pulled and it's done now. I will send a fixes pull today. thanks

Re: [Intel-gfx] Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1

2017-12-05 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Dropping GVT folks that are not affected. Keeping Zhenyu and Zhi as a heads-up, there's no need for GVT pull for this rc? On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 10:54 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Hello, > > TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY > > Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the

Re: [Intel-gfx] Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1

2017-11-28 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2017.11.28 10:54:27 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Hello, > > TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY > > Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the following patches failed to cleanly > backport to v4.15-rc1, if you believe they still are valid patches to > be included in

[Intel-gfx] Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1

2017-11-28 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hello, TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the following patches failed to cleanly backport to v4.15-rc1, if you believe they still are valid patches to be included in drm-intel-fixes, please backport them and send them as a REPLY TO THIS EMAIL