On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY
>
> Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the following patches failed to cleanly
> backport to v4.15-rc1, if you believe they still are valid patches to
>
On 2017.12.05 17:02:34 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Dropping GVT folks that are not affected.
>
> Keeping Zhenyu and Zhi as a heads-up, there's no need for GVT pull for this
> rc?
>
I need to backport one from -next once it's pulled and it's done now.
I will send a fixes pull today.
thanks
Dropping GVT folks that are not affected.
Keeping Zhenyu and Zhi as a heads-up, there's no need for GVT pull for this rc?
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 10:54 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY
>
> Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the
On 2017.11.28 10:54:27 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY
>
> Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the following patches failed to cleanly
> backport to v4.15-rc1, if you believe they still are valid patches to
> be included in
Hello,
TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY
Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the following patches failed to cleanly
backport to v4.15-rc1, if you believe they still are valid patches to
be included in drm-intel-fixes, please backport them and send them as a
REPLY TO THIS EMAIL