On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:13:07PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 10:02 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > [...]
> > Well, I have this tree:
> > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=rpm-domains-psr-vblank-counter-full
> > with mainly:
> > 1 - vblank domain on
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 10:02 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> [...]
> Well, I have this tree:
> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=rpm-domains-psr-vblank-counter-full
> with mainly:
> 1 - vblank domain on pre-enable post-disable vblanks hooks as Ville
> had suggested
> 2 - psr
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Imre Deak wrote:
> On to, 2016-02-18 at 08:56 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> Imre, Patrik, do you know if I'm missing something or what I'm doing
>> wrong with this power domain handler for vblanks to avoid DC states
>> when we need a reliable
On to, 2016-02-18 at 08:56 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Imre, Patrik, do you know if I'm missing something or what I'm doing
> wrong with this power domain handler for vblanks to avoid DC states
> when we need a reliable frame counter in place.
>
> Do you have better ideas?
Would it be possible
On to, 2016-02-18 at 08:56 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Imre, Patrik, do you know if I'm missing something or what I'm doing
> wrong with this power domain handler for vblanks to avoid DC states
> when we need a reliable frame counter in place.
The WARN is due to the spin_lock() inĀ
Imre, Patrik, do you know if I'm missing something or what I'm doing
wrong with this power domain handler for vblanks to avoid DC states
when we need a reliable frame counter in place.
Do you have better ideas?
Thanks,
Rodrigo.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rodrigo Vivi