On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:21:48PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> 2012/5/23 Daniel Vetter :
> > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:48:41PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> >> 2012/5/23 Daniel Vetter :
> >> > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:07:28AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 08:59:
2012/5/23 Daniel Vetter :
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:48:41PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>> 2012/5/23 Daniel Vetter :
>> > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:07:28AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 08:59:07AM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>> >> > Hmm I've been using i915.lvds_do
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:48:41PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> 2012/5/23 Daniel Vetter :
> > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:07:28AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 08:59:07AM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> >> > Hmm I've been using i915.lvds_downclock=1 on grub command line,
2012/5/23 Daniel Vetter :
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:07:28AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 08:59:07AM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>> > Hmm I've been using i915.lvds_downclock=1 on grub command line, and
>> > haven't noticed any visible problems with 3.3 kernel. So I'd ra
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:07:28AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 08:59:07AM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> > Hmm I've been using i915.lvds_downclock=1 on grub command line, and
> > haven't noticed any visible problems with 3.3 kernel. So I'd rather
> > ask if the problematic
On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:59:07 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac
wrote:
> 2012/5/23 Sean Paul :
> > Hmm, seems like your display doesn't like to be downclocked, or rather
> > you don't like it to be downclocked :) The reason this patch triggered
> > it is because it does a better job of finding a compatible cl
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 08:59:07AM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> 2012/5/23 Sean Paul :
> > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Zdenek Kabelac
> > wrote:
> >> 2012/5/22 Zdenek Kabelac :
> >>> 2012/5/22 Daniel Vetter :
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 04:36:30PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> > 2012
2012/5/23 Sean Paul :
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Zdenek Kabelac
> wrote:
>> 2012/5/22 Zdenek Kabelac :
>>> 2012/5/22 Daniel Vetter :
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 04:36:30PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> 2012/5/22 Daniel Vetter :
> > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:08:46PM +0200, Zdenek
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 06:21:22PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Zdenek Kabelac
> wrote:
> > 2012/5/22 Zdenek Kabelac :
> > And we have a winner - cec2f356d59d9e070413e5966a3c5a1af136d948
> >
>
> Hmm, seems like your display doesn't like to be downclocked, or rather
>
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Zdenek Kabelac
wrote:
> 2012/5/22 Zdenek Kabelac :
>> 2012/5/22 Daniel Vetter :
>>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 04:36:30PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
2012/5/22 Daniel Vetter :
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:08:46PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>> Hi
2012/5/22 Zdenek Kabelac :
> 2012/5/22 Daniel Vetter :
>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 04:36:30PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>>> 2012/5/22 Daniel Vetter :
>>> > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:08:46PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>>> >> Hi
>>> >>
>>> >> I've updated to 3.4 kernel, and now I'm noticing slig
2012/5/22 Daniel Vetter :
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 04:36:30PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>> 2012/5/22 Daniel Vetter :
>> > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:08:46PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> I've updated to 3.4 kernel, and now I'm noticing slight changes in
>> >> brightness on c
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 04:36:30PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> 2012/5/22 Daniel Vetter :
> > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:08:46PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I've updated to 3.4 kernel, and now I'm noticing slight changes in
> >> brightness on colorful images.
> >> It seems the
2012/5/22 Daniel Vetter :
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:08:46PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I've updated to 3.4 kernel, and now I'm noticing slight changes in
>> brightness on colorful images.
>> It seems the change is mostly visibly on 'darker' images i.e. it's
>> not really visible o
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:08:46PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've updated to 3.4 kernel, and now I'm noticing slight changes in
> brightness on colorful images.
> It seems the change is mostly visibly on 'darker' images i.e. it's
> not really visible on white background.
>
> When I r
Hi
I've updated to 3.4 kernel, and now I'm noticing slight changes in
brightness on colorful images.
It seems the change is mostly visibly on 'darker' images i.e. it's
not really visible on white background.
When I reboot back to 3.3 kernel - brightness changes are gone - so I
do not suspect hw
16 matches
Mail list logo