Re: [Intel-gfx] Screen corruption regression from 3.0 to 3.1rc4

2011-09-08 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
Am 08.09.2011 15:43, schrieb Eugeni Dodonov: > > Hi, > > just to help me keep track of this, is there a bug on bugzilla about it? I only reported it on the intel-gfx list. Maybe someone reported the issue at bugzilla before, but I don't know. Philipp

Re: [Intel-gfx] Screen corruption regression from 3.0 to 3.1rc4

2011-09-08 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 14:16, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Am 06.09.2011 17:53, schrieb Keith Packard: > > On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:11:12 +0200, Philipp Klaus Krause > wrote: > > > >> Here's the output from git-bisect: > >> > >> d74362c9e45689d8

Re: [Intel-gfx] Screen corruption regression from 3.0 to 3.1rc4

2011-09-07 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 06.09.2011 17:53, schrieb Keith Packard: > On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:11:12 +0200, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: > >> Here's the output from git-bisect: >> >> d74362c9e45689d8d7e3d4bcf6681c4358ef4f2e is the first bad commit >> commit d74362c9e45689d8d7e

Re: [Intel-gfx] Screen corruption regression from 3.0 to 3.1rc4

2011-09-06 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:11:12 +0200, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: > Here's the output from git-bisect: > > d74362c9e45689d8d7e3d4bcf6681c4358ef4f2e is the first bad commit > commit d74362c9e45689d8d7e3d4bcf6681c4358ef4f2e > Author: Keith Packard > Date: Thu Jul 28 14:47:14 2011 -0700 > > d

Re: [Intel-gfx] Screen corruption regression from 3.0 to 3.1rc4

2011-09-06 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 03.09.2011 12:52, schrieb Philipp Klaus Krause: > Am 03.09.2011 12:43, schrieb Daniel Vetter: > >> Lately there seem to be a few reports of "my screen doesn't update >> anymore". One thing that seems to (temporary) fix the problem is to >> switch t

Re: [Intel-gfx] Screen corruption regression from 3.0 to 3.1rc4

2011-09-03 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 12:52, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: >>> This regression was introduced between 3.0 and 3.1rc1. >> >> If it's a kernel regression, can you please try to bisect it? >> > > I might have a look at it when I find the time to do so. That would be very useful. Your description soun

Re: [Intel-gfx] Screen corruption regression from 3.0 to 3.1rc4

2011-09-03 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
Am 03.09.2011 12:43, schrieb Daniel Vetter: > Lately there seem to be a few reports of "my screen doesn't update > anymore". One thing that seems to (temporary) fix the problem is to > switch to the kernel console and back to X. Does that help in your > case? > Yes. Temporary: For a few seconds,

Re: [Intel-gfx] Screen corruption regression from 3.0 to 3.1rc4

2011-09-03 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 11:31, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: > Am 31.08.2011 08:43, schrieb Philipp Klaus Krause: >> In the free game simutrans, in fullscreen mode I see the following problem: >> The lower about 2 cm of the screen don't update. They are black or carry >> the image from the game start

Re: [Intel-gfx] Screen corruption regression from 3.0 to 3.1rc4

2011-09-03 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
Am 31.08.2011 08:43, schrieb Philipp Klaus Krause: > In the free game simutrans, in fullscreen mode I see the following problem: > The lower about 2 cm of the screen don't update. They are black or carry > the image from the game startup screen. They flicker once in a while, > but otherwise the ima

[Intel-gfx] Screen corruption regression from 3.0 to 3.1rc4

2011-08-31 Thread Philipp Klaus Krause
In the free game simutrans, in fullscreen mode I see the following problem: The lower about 2 cm of the screen don't update. They are black or carry the image from the game startup screen. They flicker once in a while, but otherwise the image stays the same. lspci output: 00:02.0 VGA compatible co