Re: [Intel-gfx] Time for execbuf3 ?

2019-03-22 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-03-22 11:36:35) > On 21/03/2019 14:15, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-03-21 14:08:39) > >> Mostly it's just about having the ability to extend it. > >> I can't really tell you up front what we're going to need until we do :) > > Yup. My takea

Re: [Intel-gfx] Time for execbuf3 ?

2019-03-22 Thread Lionel Landwerlin
On 21/03/2019 14:15, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-03-21 14:08:39) Mostly it's just about having the ability to extend it. I can't really tell you up front what we're going to need until we do :) Yup. My takeaway is that the uAPI debugability is something that has never be

Re: [Intel-gfx] Time for execbuf3 ?

2019-03-21 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-03-21 14:08:39) > Mostly it's just about having the ability to extend it. > I can't really tell you up front what we're going to need until we do :) Yup. My takeaway is that the uAPI debugability is something that has never been taken seriously (-EINVAL!). And that

Re: [Intel-gfx] Time for execbuf3 ?

2019-03-21 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 19-03-2019 om 18:20 schreef Chris Wilson: > Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-03-19 16:39:52) >> Hi all, >> >> There are couple of extensions coming up for our userspace drivers (anv/i965) >> where we need to add additional parameters to execbuf : >> >> - VK_KHR_timeline_semaphore : supplying

Re: [Intel-gfx] Time for execbuf3 ?

2019-03-21 Thread Lionel Landwerlin
On 21/03/2019 09:46, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-03-19 18:39:52) Hi all, There are couple of extensions coming up for our userspace drivers (anv/i965) where we need to add additional parameters to execbuf : - VK_KHR_timeline_semaphore : supplying u64 points toge

Re: [Intel-gfx] Time for execbuf3 ?

2019-03-21 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-03-19 18:39:52) > Hi all, > > There are couple of extensions coming up for our userspace drivers (anv/i965) > where we need to add additional parameters to execbuf : > > - VK_KHR_timeline_semaphore : supplying u64 points together with syncobjs > [1] > -

Re: [Intel-gfx] Time for execbuf3 ?

2019-03-19 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-03-19 16:39:52) > Hi all, > > There are couple of extensions coming up for our userspace drivers (anv/i965) > where we need to add additional parameters to execbuf : > > - VK_KHR_timeline_semaphore : supplying u64 points together with syncobjs > [1] > -

[Intel-gfx] Time for execbuf3 ?

2019-03-19 Thread Lionel Landwerlin
Hi all, There are couple of extensions coming up for our userspace drivers (anv/i965) where we need to add additional parameters to execbuf : - VK_KHR_timeline_semaphore : supplying u64 points together with syncobjs [1] - a non public piece of work related to performance counters [2]