Re: [Intel-gfx] Xorg SEGV in Xen PV dom0 after updating from 5.16.18 to 5.17.5 #forregzbot

2022-08-16 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
TWIMC: this mail is primarily send for documentation purposes and for regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot. These mails usually contain '#forregzbot' in the subject, to make them easy to spot and filter. On 04.05.22 07:46, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 04.05.22 02:37, Marek Marczykowsk

Re: [Intel-gfx] Xorg SEGV in Xen PV dom0 after updating from 5.16.18 to 5.17.5

2022-05-15 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 04.05.22 08:48, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 04.05.22 07:46, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. Sending this just to >> CC the developers of the culprit mentioned below (bdd8b6c98239cad >> ("drm/i915: replace X86_FEATURE_PAT with pat_enabled()")) and the >

Re: [Intel-gfx] Xorg SEGV in Xen PV dom0 after updating from 5.16.18 to 5.17.5

2022-05-03 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
On 04.05.22 08:48, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 04.05.22 07:46, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. Sending this just to >> CC the developers of the culprit mentioned below (bdd8b6c98239cad >> ("drm/i915: replace X86_FEATURE_PAT with pat_enabled()")) and the >

Re: [Intel-gfx] Xorg SEGV in Xen PV dom0 after updating from 5.16.18 to 5.17.5

2022-05-03 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. Sending this just to CC the developers of the culprit mentioned below (bdd8b6c98239cad ("drm/i915: replace X86_FEATURE_PAT with pat_enabled()")) and the maintainers for the subsystem. While at it a quick note: I wonder if this is problem a similar