On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 07:21:35PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 07:57:38PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Calling i915_gem_object_get_dma_address() from the vblank
> > evade critical section triggers might_sleep().
> >
> > While we know
day, March 25, 2024 11:28 PM
> > > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org; Borislav Petkov
> > > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Pre-populate the cursor physical dma address
> > >
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
el.org; Borislav Petkov
> > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Pre-populate the cursor physical dma address
> >
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Calling i915_gem_object_get_dma_address() from the vblank evade critical
> > section triggers might_sleep().
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Ville
> Syrjala
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 11:28 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org; Borislav Petkov
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Pre-populate the cursor physical dma add
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 07:57:38PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Calling i915_gem_object_get_dma_address() from the vblank
> evade critical section triggers might_sleep().
>
> While we know that we've already pinned the framebuffer
> and thus
From: Ville Syrjälä
Calling i915_gem_object_get_dma_address() from the vblank
evade critical section triggers might_sleep().
While we know that we've already pinned the framebuffer
and thus i915_gem_object_get_dma_address() will in fact
not sleep in this case, it seems reasonable to keep the
