On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:08:57 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2024-04-09 11:55:33 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > I believe you need to do it in the .c file:
> >
> > Can you try something like this?
> >
> …
> > ?
>
> I tried and nothing changed because the lowlevel config op
On 2024-04-09 11:55:33 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I believe you need to do it in the .c file:
>
> Can you try something like this?
>
…
> ?
I tried and nothing changed because the lowlevel config option isn't the
problem. What about I drop this and replace 4/10 from this series with
the pa
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 13:06:01 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> among a few other things I was not aware of.
> So yes, this patch is not needed since it makes no difference but I still
> have trace points I would rather not have.
> If you a clue how to deal with this properly, I am all yours
On 2024-04-08 13:06:50 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:18:23 +0200
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> > The order of the header files is important. If this header file is
> > included after tracepoint.h was included then the NOTRACE here becomes a
> > nop. Currently th
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:18:23 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The order of the header files is important. If this header file is
> included after tracepoint.h was included then the NOTRACE here becomes a
> nop. Currently this happens for two .c files which use the tracepoitns
> behind DRM
The order of the header files is important. If this header file is
included after tracepoint.h was included then the NOTRACE here becomes a
nop. Currently this happens for two .c files which use the tracepoitns
behind DRM_I915_LOW_LEVEL_TRACEPOINTS.
Cc: Steven Rostedt
Signed-off-by: Sebastian And
