On Mon, 13 May 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 03:10:29PM GMT, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>On Fri, 10 May 2024, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> The xe->enabled_irq_mask member has never been used for anything.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
>>
>>Lucas, ack for merging these two via dr
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 03:10:29PM GMT, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2024, Jani Nikula wrote:
The xe->enabled_irq_mask member has never been used for anything.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Lucas, ack for merging these two via drm-intel-next? Even though these
touch struct xe_device, I pr
On Fri, 10 May 2024, Jani Nikula wrote:
> The xe->enabled_irq_mask member has never been used for anything.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
Lucas, ack for merging these two via drm-intel-next? Even though these
touch struct xe_device, I presume any further cleanups touching the
surrounding contex
On 10-05-2024 15:13, Jani Nikula wrote:
The xe->enabled_irq_mask member has never been used for anything.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h| 2 --
2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu
The xe->enabled_irq_mask member has never been used for anything.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h| 2 --
2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm
