Re: [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/pciids: don't include WHL/CML PCI IDs in CFL

2024-05-10 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 02:22:18PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > It's confusing for INTEL_CFL_IDS() to include all WHL and CML PCI > IDs. Even if we treat them the same in a lot of places, CML is a > platform of its own, and the lists of PCI IDs should not conflate them. > > Largely go by the idea t

[PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/pciids: don't include WHL/CML PCI IDs in CFL

2024-05-10 Thread Jani Nikula
It's confusing for INTEL_CFL_IDS() to include all WHL and CML PCI IDs. Even if we treat them the same in a lot of places, CML is a platform of its own, and the lists of PCI IDs should not conflate them. Largely go by the idea that if a platform has a name, group its PCI IDs together. That said, A