On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 07:21:35PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 07:57:38PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Calling i915_gem_object_get_dma_address() from the vblank
> > evade critical section triggers might_sleep().
> >
> > While we know
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 01:36:29PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 04:57:57AM +, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of
> > > Ville
> > > Syrjala
> > > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 11:28 PM
> > > To:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 04:57:57AM +, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Ville
> > Syrjala
> > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 11:28 PM
> > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org; Borislav Petkov
> > Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Ville
> Syrjala
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 11:28 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org; Borislav Petkov
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Pre-populate the cursor physical dma address
>
> From: Ville
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 07:57:38PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Calling i915_gem_object_get_dma_address() from the vblank
> evade critical section triggers might_sleep().
>
> While we know that we've already pinned the framebuffer
> and thus
