On Tue, 26 Nov 2019, Lyude Paul wrote:
> I'm about to post some more review comments for the v2 version of this, but
> some comments down below...
>
> On Tue, 2019-10-08 at 12:19 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Oct 2019, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 12:08 +0300, Jani
I'm about to post some more review comments for the v2 version of this, but
some comments down below...
On Tue, 2019-10-08 at 12:19 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Oct 2019, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 12:08 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >
> > > The problem with the EDID
On Tue, 08 Oct 2019, Jani Nikula wrote:
>On Mon, 07 Oct 2019, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 12:08 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>
>>> The problem with the EDID quirks is that exposing the quirks sticks out
>>> like a sore thumb. Thus far all of it has been contained in drm_edid.c
>>>
On Mon, 07 Oct 2019, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 12:08 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
>> The problem with the EDID quirks is that exposing the quirks sticks out
>> like a sore thumb. Thus far all of it has been contained in drm_edid.c
>> and they affect how the EDID gets parsed, for
On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 12:08 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> The problem with the EDID quirks is that exposing the quirks sticks out
> like a sore thumb. Thus far all of it has been contained in drm_edid.c
> and they affect how the EDID gets parsed, for all drivers. Obviously
> this could be changed,
On Mon, 07 Oct 2019, "Jani Nikula"
mailto:jani.nik...@intel.com>> wrote:
>On Mon, 07 Oct 2019, "Lee, Shawn C"
>mailto:shawn.c@intel.com>> wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Jani Nikula
>> mailto:jani.nik...@intel.com>> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Adam Jackson mailto:a...@redhat.com>>
On Mon, 07 Oct 2019, "Jani Nikula" wrote:
>On Mon, 07 Oct 2019, "Lee, Shawn C" wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 05:58 +0800, Lee Shawn C wrote:
> This panel (manufacturer is SDC, product ID is 0x4141)
On Mon, 07 Oct 2019, "Lee, Shawn C" wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 05:58 +0800, Lee Shawn C wrote:
This panel (manufacturer is SDC, product ID is 0x4141) used
manufacturer defined DPCD register to
On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Jani Nikula wrote:
>On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 05:58 +0800, Lee Shawn C wrote:
>>> This panel (manufacturer is SDC, product ID is 0x4141) used
>>> manufacturer defined DPCD register to control brightness that not
>>> defined in eDP
On Fri, 04 Oct 2019, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 05:58 +0800, Lee Shawn C wrote:
>> This panel (manufacturer is SDC, product ID is 0x4141)
>> used manufacturer defined DPCD register to control brightness
>> that not defined in eDP spec so far. This change follow panel
>> vendor's
On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 05:58 +0800, Lee Shawn C wrote:
> This panel (manufacturer is SDC, product ID is 0x4141)
> used manufacturer defined DPCD register to control brightness
> that not defined in eDP spec so far. This change follow panel
> vendor's instruction to support brightness adjustment.
11 matches
Mail list logo