On 07/08/2015 07:51 AM, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
From: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
When constructing a batchbuffer, it is sometimes crucial to know the
largest hole into which we can fit a fenceable buffer (for example when
handling very large objects on gen2 and gen3).
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:28:33PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:13:43PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
On 07/08/2015 07:51 AM, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
From: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
When constructing a batchbuffer, it is
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:13:43PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
On 07/08/2015 07:51 AM, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
From: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
When constructing a batchbuffer, it is sometimes crucial to know the
largest hole into which we can fit a
On 07/08/2015 02:28 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:13:43PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
On 07/08/2015 07:51 AM, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
From: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
When constructing a batchbuffer, it is sometimes crucial to know the
Hi,
On 07/08/2015 07:51 AM, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
From: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
When constructing a batchbuffer, it is sometimes crucial to know the
largest hole into which we can fit a fenceable buffer (for example when
handling very large objects on gen2 and
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:36:08PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 07/08/2015 02:28 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:13:43PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
On 07/08/2015 07:51 AM, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
From: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
On 07/08/2015 02:53 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:36:08PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 07/08/2015 02:28 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:13:43PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
On 07/08/2015 07:51 AM, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
From:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 03:24:08PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 07/08/2015 02:53 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:36:08PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 07/08/2015 02:28 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:13:43PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 15:39 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 02:55:12PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com
wrote:
From: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com
When constructing a batchbuffer, it is sometimes crucial to know the
largest hole into which we can fit a
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 02:55:12PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
From: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com
When constructing a batchbuffer, it is sometimes crucial to know the
largest hole into which we can fit a fenceable buffer (for example when
handling very large objects
10 matches
Mail list logo
