On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 15:43 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 06-01-18 om 10:51 schreef Dhinakaran Pandiyan:
> > On Thursday, January 4, 2018 12:35:48 PM PST Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Op 03-01-18 om 21:39 schreef Dhinakaran Pandiyan:
> >>> Since we want to allow for a non-blocking power doma
Op 06-01-18 om 10:51 schreef Dhinakaran Pandiyan:
> On Thursday, January 4, 2018 12:35:48 PM PST Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Op 03-01-18 om 21:39 schreef Dhinakaran Pandiyan:
>>> Since we want to allow for a non-blocking power domain for vblanks,
>>> the power domain use count and power well use co
On Thursday, January 4, 2018 12:35:48 PM PST Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 03-01-18 om 21:39 schreef Dhinakaran Pandiyan:
> > Since we want to allow for a non-blocking power domain for vblanks,
> > the power domain use count and power well use count will not be updated
> > atomically inside the pow
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 10:09 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 11:23:54AM +, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > Op 04-01-18 om 22:51 schreef Pandiyan, Dhinakaran:
> > > On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 12:35 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > >> Wouldn't it be better to make intel_power_do
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 11:23:54AM +, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 04-01-18 om 22:51 schreef Pandiyan, Dhinakaran:
> > On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 12:35 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Wouldn't it be better to make intel_power_domains_verify_state work
> >> correctly with the vblank irq?
> > I
Op 04-01-18 om 22:51 schreef Pandiyan, Dhinakaran:
> On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 12:35 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be better to make intel_power_domains_verify_state work
>> correctly with the vblank irq?
> I tried to :) Since I changed the domain_use_count to atomic_t and moved
> it o
On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 12:35 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to make intel_power_domains_verify_state work
> correctly with the vblank irq?
I tried to :) Since I changed the domain_use_count to atomic_t and moved
it outside of the locks, verify_state became racy. Let me tak
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 20:57 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Dhinakaran Pandiyan (2018-01-03 20:39:59)
> > Since we want to allow for a non-blocking power domain for vblanks,
> > the power domain use count and power well use count will not be updated
> > atomically inside the power domain mut
Op 03-01-18 om 21:39 schreef Dhinakaran Pandiyan:
> Since we want to allow for a non-blocking power domain for vblanks,
> the power domain use count and power well use count will not be updated
> atomically inside the power domain mutex (see next patch). This affects
> verifying if sum(power_domain
Quoting Dhinakaran Pandiyan (2018-01-03 20:39:59)
> Since we want to allow for a non-blocking power domain for vblanks,
> the power domain use count and power well use count will not be updated
> atomically inside the power domain mutex (see next patch). This affects
> verifying if sum(power_domain
10 matches
Mail list logo
