On Thu, 2019-05-16 at 15:40 -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>
>
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
> > @@ -9,16 +9,18 @@
> >
> > #include
> > #include
> > +#include
>
> AFAICS this header is not needed anymore. With it rem
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
@@ -9,16 +9,18 @@
#include
#include
+#include
AFAICS this header is not needed anymore. With it removed:
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
Daniele
struct drm_i915_private;
#define
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -84,17 +84,46 @@ void intel_device_info_dump_flags(const struct
intel_device_info *info,
#undef PRINT_FLAG
}
+#define SS_STR_MAX_SIZE (GEN_MAX_SUBSLICE_STRIDE * 2 + 1)
+
+static char *
On Tue, 2019-05-07 at 14:16 -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> > > > @@ -84,17 +84,46 @@ void intel_device_info_dump_flags(const
> > > > struct
> > > > intel_device_info *i
On Tue, 2019-05-07 at 12:00 -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>
> On 5/3/19 2:30 PM, Stuart Summers wrote:
> > Currently, the subslice_mask runtime parameter is stored as an
> > array of subslices per slice. Expand the subslice mask array to
> > better match what is presented to userspace throu
On 5/3/19 2:30 PM, Stuart Summers wrote:
Currently, the subslice_mask runtime parameter is stored as an
array of subslices per slice. Expand the subslice mask array to
better match what is presented to userspace through the
I915_QUERY_TOPOLOGY_INFO ioctl. The index into this array is
then calcu
On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 12:03 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2019, Stuart Summers wrote:
> > Currently, the subslice_mask runtime parameter is stored as an
> > array of subslices per slice. Expand the subslice mask array to
> > better match what is presented to userspace through the
> >
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019, Stuart Summers wrote:
> Currently, the subslice_mask runtime parameter is stored as an
> array of subslices per slice. Expand the subslice mask array to
> better match what is presented to userspace through the
> I915_QUERY_TOPOLOGY_INFO ioctl. The index into this array is
> t
