Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/icl: Work around broken VBTs for port F detection

2019-01-17 Thread Imre Deak
Hi, On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:33:19PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 17:52 +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > > VBT may include incorrect information about the presence of port F. > > Work > > around this on SKUs where we know the port is not present. > > If we cannot trust the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/icl: Work around broken VBTs for port F detection

2019-01-16 Thread Dhinakaran Pandiyan
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 17:52 +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > VBT may include incorrect information about the presence of port F. > Work > around this on SKUs where we know the port is not present. If we cannot trust the data in VBT, can we not test for the absence of port-F by enabling the powerwell and