Re: [Intel-gfx] [SKL-DMC-BUGFIX 4/5] drm/i915/skl: Block disable call for pw1 if dmc firmware is present.

2015-10-12 Thread Imre Deak
On ma, 2015-08-03 at 21:55 +0530, Animesh Manna wrote: > Another interesting criteria to work dmc as expected is pw1 to be > enabled by driver and dmc will shut it off in its execution > sequence. If already disabled by driver dmc will get confuse and > behave differently than expected found during

Re: [Intel-gfx] [SKL-DMC-BUGFIX 4/5] drm/i915/skl: Block disable call for pw1 if dmc firmware is present.

2015-08-06 Thread Animesh Manna
On 8/5/2015 2:44 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:55:35PM +0530, Animesh Manna wrote: Another interesting criteria to work dmc as expected is pw1 to be enabled by driver and dmc will shut it off in its execution sequence. If already disabled by driver dmc will get confuse an

Re: [Intel-gfx] [SKL-DMC-BUGFIX 4/5] drm/i915/skl: Block disable call for pw1 if dmc firmware is present.

2015-08-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:55:35PM +0530, Animesh Manna wrote: > Another interesting criteria to work dmc as expected is pw1 to be > enabled by driver and dmc will shut it off in its execution > sequence. If already disabled by driver dmc will get confuse and > behave differently than expected foun

Re: [Intel-gfx] [SKL-DMC-BUGFIX 4/5] drm/i915/skl: Block disable call for pw1 if dmc firmware is present.

2015-08-04 Thread Sunil Kamath
On Monday 03 August 2015 09:55 PM, Animesh Manna wrote: Another interesting criteria to work dmc as expected is pw1 to be enabled by driver and dmc will shut it off in its execution sequence. If already disabled by driver dmc will get confuse and behave differently than expected found during pc10