Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function"

On 6/10/24 22:14, Zhang, Rui wrote: On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 08:36 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: Dear Hui, Naama also added Tested-by lines two both commits in question. Could Intel’s test coverage please extended to the problem at hand? Acked-by: Paul Menzel Plus that, 1. Todd and I can test w

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function"

On 6/10/24 14:36, Paul Menzel wrote: Dear Hui, Thank you for your patch. Am 10.06.24 um 03:32 schrieb Hui Wang: This reverts commit bfd546a552e140b0a4c8a21527c39d6d21addb28 Commit bfd546a552e1 ("e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function") introduces system suspend failu

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function"

On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 08:36 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear Hui, > > > Thank you for your patch. > > > Am 10.06.24 um 03:32 schrieb Hui Wang: > > This reverts commit bfd546a552e140b0a4c8a21527c39d6d21addb28 > > > > Commit bfd546a552e1 ("e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of > > enable_ulp

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function"

Dear Hui, Thank you for your patch. Am 10.06.24 um 03:32 schrieb Hui Wang: This reverts commit bfd546a552e140b0a4c8a21527c39d6d21addb28 Commit bfd546a552e1 ("e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function") introduces system suspend failure on some ethernet cards, at the moment

[Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function"

This reverts commit bfd546a552e140b0a4c8a21527c39d6d21addb28 Commit bfd546a552e1 ("e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function") introduces system suspend failure on some ethernet cards, at the moment, the pciid of the affected ethernet cards include [8086:15b8] and [8086:15bc].