Hi,
I am creating 10 different forms. All of them have a common header and
footer. Header will have the same background image but different titles
for different forms. Footer is also similar in concept. I would like to
make the header and footer design only once and reuse them in all the
forms
For your first solution, you can use designer for child forms too. Just add
designer form class with widget template and insert widget to the center of
your common form design.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Lijo Antony wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am creating 10 different forms. All of them have a com
On Jun 10, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Jelmer van der Linde wrote:
> On Sunday 10 June 2012 at 15:14, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>> A further attempt to narrow down the issue could be to try different
>> paint engines ("raster" or "native"): AFAIK up to Qt 4.7 the "native
>> painter" was used, but it could be
Hi Lijo,
I would use one of two different approaches:
The first is to add a QWidget as header and footer on all your forms.
Then you promote the header widget to your header class and the footer
to your footer class. You can set the extra properties by using dynamic
properties.
This way has t
On 06/11/2012 12:31 PM, Bo Thorsen wrote:
> Hi Lijo,
>
> I would use one of two different approaches:
>
> The first is to add a QWidget as header and footer on all your forms.
> Then you promote the header widget to your header class and the footer
> to your footer class. You can set the extra prop
Hi,
I need to play video in my windows Seven qml application. On qt4, it
was working with directshow (but It don't works with windows H264
decoder ... I need to distribute my apps with a commercial decoder). I
have tryed with wmf plugin : It works with windows H264 decoder, but
when I delete
Well this is an odd one. We recently moved from Qt 4.5.3 to 4.7.4. Our
application crashes during startup when NOT run with admin rights.
Anyone seen anything like this?
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailm
> Well this is an odd one. We recently moved from Qt 4.5.3 to 4.7.4. Our
> application crashes during startup when NOT run with admin rights.
>
> Anyone seen anything like this?
Hi Paul,
It's hard to say for sure without more information, but here are a few things
you can check that might help t
On 06/12/2012 12:18 AM, Paul Miller wrote:
> Well this is an odd one. We recently moved from Qt 4.5.3 to 4.7.4. Our
> application crashes during startup when NOT run with admin rights.
>
> Anyone seen anything like this?
Hi Paul,
are we talking about Windows, Linux or OS X?
Sounds like a problem
On 6/11/2012 12:24 PM, Guenther Boelter wrote:
> On 06/12/2012 12:18 AM, Paul Miller wrote:
>> Well this is an odd one. We recently moved from Qt 4.5.3 to 4.7.4. Our
>> application crashes during startup when NOT run with admin rights.
>>
>> Anyone seen anything like this?
> Hi Paul,
>
> are we tal
On 06/12/2012 01:27 AM, Paul Miller wrote:
> On 6/11/2012 12:24 PM, Guenther Boelter wrote:
>> On 06/12/2012 12:18 AM, Paul Miller wrote:
>>> Well this is an odd one. We recently moved from Qt 4.5.3 to 4.7.4. Our
>>> application crashes during startup when NOT run with admin rights.
>>>
>>> Anyone
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:36:40 +
> From: Turunen Tuukka
>
>There is no Qt Project SDK for 4.8 - just the Nokia SDK and Qt Commercial
SDK.
[snip]
> At the moment there are standalone LGPL and Commercial installers,
> and the Qt Commercial SDK available for 4.8.2 and Nokia SDK 1.2.2
hopefull
http://woboq.com/blog/cpp11-in-qt5.html
Can someone part of the Qt project, explain the reasoning for this...
While in general I love the idea... In specific, I have had customers
that are 5-10 years behind in their compiler choice..
Usually in the embedded world, where the processor doesn
On Jun 11, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
>
> http://woboq.com/blog/cpp11-in-qt5.html
>
> Can someone part of the Qt project, explain the reasoning for this…
>
> While in general I love the idea… In specific, I have had customers that are
> 5-10 years behind in their compiler ch
On 11 June 2012 21:35, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> Can someone part of the Qt project, explain the reasoning for this…
>
> While in general I love the idea… In specific, I have had customers that are
> 5-10 years behind in their compiler choice..
>
> Usually in the embedded world, where the processo
On Jun 11, 2012, at 4:52 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> On 11 June 2012 21:35, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
>> Can someone part of the Qt project, explain the reasoning for this…
>>
>> While in general I love the idea… In specific, I have had customers that are
>> 5-10 years behind in their compiler
On segunda-feira, 11 de junho de 2012 13.35.56, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> http://woboq.com/blog/cpp11-in-qt5.html
>
>
>
> Can someone part of the Qt project, explain the reasoning for this...
>
> While in general I love the idea... In specific, I have had customers
> that are 5-10 years behind in t
On 06/11/2012 09:52 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> I think there's a misunderstanding: C++11 support IS NOT required to
> use or build Qt 5. If you have a recent compiler and enable C++11
> support in Qt, then you get those nice extra features. Otherwise you
> don't. But you can still use Qt 5 with
I would say almost all NEW embedded systems..
However, I can tell you, I had a client last year stuck on gcc 2.4, because the
CPU vendor who put out the gcc tool chain, never updated them, and those with
hardware chains they didn't want to (or couldn't) update were SOL.
Scott
-Original Mes
You cannot build Qt with GCC 2.4.
On 12/06/12 00:19, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> I would say almost all NEW embedded systems..
>
> However, I can tell you, I had a client last year stuck on gcc 2.4, because
> the CPU vendor who put out the gcc tool chain, never updated them, and those
> with hardw
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Rui Maciel wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 09:52 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> > I think there's a misunderstanding: C++11 support IS NOT required to
> > use or build Qt 5. If you have a recent compiler and enable C++11
> > support in Qt, then you get those nice ext
12.06.2012, 01:49, "Nikos Chantziaras" :
> You cannot build Qt with GCC 2.4.
Well, with 2.95 it's possible (after some patching)
--
Regards,
Konstantin
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/int
On terça-feira, 12 de junho de 2012 02.06.35, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 12.06.2012, 01:49, "Nikos Chantziaras" :
> > You cannot build Qt with GCC 2.4.
>
> Well, with 2.95 it's possible (after some patching)
Completely unsupported. Qt 4.0 was released with minimum support of 3.2 and
that was rais
Yes you can... Not Qt 4... But you can build Qt :)
-Original Message-
From: interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org
[mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
Nikos Chantziaras
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 2:49 PM
To: interest@qt-proj
I just pulled Qt 5 from git and don't see the new C++11 option. They are
in the master branch of qtbase but Qt 5 doesn't pull that in yet.
Is this new C++11 option going to be in the final Qt 5 release?
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
Stephen Chu said:
> I just pulled Qt 5 from git and don't see the new C++11 option. They are
> in the master branch of qtbase but Qt 5 doesn't pull that in yet.
>
Right, that's actually because it appears to have caused a few
regressions. The new qtbase will only arrive in qt5's git once all
kno
26 matches
Mail list logo
