Re: [Interest] qtWebsocket SSL question

Use openssl's cert generation features. > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 at 11:24 AM > From: "Alexander Carôt" > To: "qt qt" > Subject: [Interest] qtWebsocket SSL question > > Hello all, > > I just started investigating websockets with Qt and

[Interest] qtWebsocket SSL question

Hello all, I just started investigating websockets with Qt and now have a question regarding this example: http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtwebsockets-sslechoserver-example.html I compiled it but encountered the issue of missing files: RCC: Error in 'securesocketclient.qrc': Cannot find file

Re: [Interest] Problem location symbol on android

I'm not sure of your exact issue, looks good to me. But do note: 1. You may need a QTPLUGIN 2. The android dynamic linker is single-pass, one-way. All prerequisites must me loaded prior to the library containing depenencies.   But, given your logs I think it should be working. I've not used

[Interest] qt.labs.controls - ApplicationWindow - size

the Gallery example from qt.labs.controls http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtlabscontrols-gallery-gallery-qml.html defines the ApplicationWindow this way: ApplicationWindow { id: window width: 360 height: 520 visible: true

Re: [Interest] Qt "Tools" GPLv3 Exception 1 Confusion

On 08/04/16 03:41, d3fault wrote: int main() { QFile file(“/path/to/main.cpp”); file.open(); QByteArray outputFromQtCreatorInOriginalForm = file.readAll(); QFile file2(“/whatever.cpp”); file.open(); file2.write(outputFromQtCreatorInOriginalForm); } So since I

Re: [Interest] Qt "Tools" GPLv3 Exception 1 Confusion

I think, by reading the whole paragraph, that you don't have the right to make for instance a tool that "wraps" moc / uic / rcc and use it under a non-LGPLv3 license. On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Jean-Michaël Celerier < jeanmichael.celer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:41

Re: [Interest] Qt "Tools" GPLv3 Exception 1 Confusion

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:41 AM, d3fault wrote: > So since I wrote /path/to/main.cpp in Qt Creator, it’s “output from > this application”, and since it generates itself, it “generates output > from this application in it’s original […] form”. > I don't think that this