Re: [Interest] How do you want to select exactly C++11 with GCC 6+?

Den 10 mars 2017 12:19 fm skrev "Thiago Macieira" : > > On quinta-feira, 9 de março de 2017 18:12:57 CET Sérgio Martins wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Thiago Macieira > > > 1) is there a need for qmake to provide a way to select *exactly* C++11, > > > not a later, available version? > >

Re: [Interest] Support for Visual Studio 2017

Visual Studio About screen shows .NET Framework Version 4.6.01586 I turned off Windows Defender but I now get a message saying "This extension is already installed to all applicable products". It's never completed the install and doesn't appear in VS2017. Turning it on doesn't make any differenc

[Interest] signed DLLs/Frameworks for Qt

I notice that the official distributions for Qt commercial contain unsigned DLLs and frameworks. Does the Qt Company have any plans to sign these in a future release? Mac App Store requires all frameworks to be signed, although I don't think macOS is enforcing it for frameworks in non-store ap

Re: [Interest] generated header file not being processed by moc

Is this something that could be handled better by qbs? Glen > On Feb 14, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Glen Mabey wrote: > > > Well, I have the strangest of solutions that isn’t clean, pretty, or even > explainable (by me). > > Consider these extra rules (linux only) so the complete .pro file looks like

Re: [Interest] How do you want to select exactly C++11 with GCC 6+?

On quinta-feira, 9 de março de 2017 18:12:57 CET Sérgio Martins wrote: > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Thiago Macieira > > 1) is there a need for qmake to provide a way to select *exactly* C++11, > > not a later, available version? > > I wouldn't worry much about it, aren't C++11 and C++14 ABI c

Re: [Interest] Support for Visual Studio 2017

Hi, just guessing, but googling the error suggests: check that your .NET Framework has been updated to 4.6 and also turn off any antivirus program. Rgrds Henry On 2017-03-09 23:33, Tom Isaacson wrote: Unfortunately it fails for me: 10/03/2017 11:31:08 AM - Microsoft VSIX Installer 10/03/2017

Re: [Interest] Support for Visual Studio 2017

Unfortunately it fails for me: 10/03/2017 11:31:08 AM - Microsoft VSIX Installer 10/03/2017 11:31:08 AM - --- 10/03/2017 11:31:08 AM - vsixinstaller.exe version: 10/03/2017 11:31:08 AM - 15.0.26228.0 built by: D15REL 10/03/2017 11:31:08 AM -

Re: [Interest] How do you want to select exactly C++11 with GCC 6+?

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > This is a straw poll to see if we should change qmake's behaviour for Qt 5.9. > > GCC 6 and ICC 17, in the absence of -std= comipler options, default ot C++14. > So I have two questions: > > 1) is there a need for qmake to provide a way to s

Re: [Interest] How do you want to select exactly C++11 with GCC 6+?

On Thu, March 9, 2017 15:54, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em quinta-feira, 9 de março de 2017, às 15:04:55 CET, Konrad Rosenbaum > escreveu: >> CONFIG -= c++14 feels like "give me whatever predates C++ 14, even if it >> is C++ 98" or simply "I'm a hillbilly, disable those newfangled C++ 14 >> features!

Re: [Interest] How do you want to select exactly C++11 with GCC 6+?

> 1) is there a need for qmake to provide a way to select *exactly* C++11, not > a later, available version? I would say no. > 2) but IF well then I would prefer option I CONFIG += c++11 means plus c++11 language extensions CONFIG += c++14 means plus c++11 and plus c++14 langua

Re: [Interest] How do you want to select exactly C++11 with GCC 6+?

On 9 March 2017 at 15:53, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Em quinta-feira, 9 de março de 2017, às 14:47:58 CET, Konstantin Tokarev > escreveu: > > I would prefer something like CXX_STANDARD = c++11 > > And how do you select "C++11 or later" ? CXX_STANDARD = min_c++11 Or something similar ? _

Re: [Interest] How do you want to select exactly C++11 with GCC 6+?

Em quinta-feira, 9 de março de 2017, às 15:04:55 CET, Konrad Rosenbaum escreveu: > CONFIG -= c++14 feels like "give me whatever predates C++ 14, even if it > is C++ 98" or simply "I'm a hillbilly, disable those newfangled C++ 14 > features!" I guess you'd do [changed to future version as C++11 is

Re: [Interest] How do you want to select exactly C++11 with GCC 6+?

Em quinta-feira, 9 de março de 2017, às 14:47:58 CET, Konstantin Tokarev escreveu: > I would prefer something like CXX_STANDARD = c++11 And how do you select "C++11 or later" ? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center __

Re: [Interest] How do you want to select exactly C++11 with GCC 6+?

On Thu, March 9, 2017 14:13, Thiago Macieira wrote: > 1) is there a need for qmake to provide a way to select *exactly* C++11, > not a > later, available version? I don't see it. If I wanted to do compiler behavior tests I'd either not use qmake or use a more specific command like: QMAKE_CXXFLAGS

Re: [Interest] How do you want to select exactly C++11 with GCC 6+?

09.03.2017, 16:14, "Thiago Macieira" : > This is a straw poll to see if we should change qmake's behaviour for Qt 5.9. > > GCC 6 and ICC 17, in the absence of -std= comipler options, default ot C++14. > So I have two questions: > > 1) is there a need for qmake to provide a way to select *exactly*

Re: [Interest] How do you want to select exactly C++11 with GCC 6+?

Em quinta-feira, 9 de março de 2017, às 14:24:13 CET, Viktor Engelmann escreveu: > I'd prefer option I, because saying "I want X" feels more precise and to > the point than "I don't want Y". In a restaurant, you don't order "not > fish", do you? Uh... sometimes you do. I order hamburgers and say,

Re: [Interest] How do you want to select exactly C++11 with GCC 6+?

I'd prefer option I, because saying "I want X" feels more precise and to the point than "I don't want Y". In a restaurant, you don't order "not fish", do you? On 09.03.2017 14:13, Thiago Macieira wrote: > This is a straw poll to see if we should change qmake's behaviour for Qt 5.9. > > GCC 6 and

Re: [Interest] What is the status of Qt and MinGW 64 for Windows?

Em quinta-feira, 9 de março de 2017, às 11:17:18 CET, Carel Combrink escreveu: > Hi, > > I would like to get a status update on what is the current > thinking/planning regarding 64-bit applications on Windows using MinGW? > > I am fully aware of the MinGW-64-Bit

[Interest] How do you want to select exactly C++11 with GCC 6+?

This is a straw poll to see if we should change qmake's behaviour for Qt 5.9. GCC 6 and ICC 17, in the absence of -std= comipler options, default ot C++14. So I have two questions: 1) is there a need for qmake to provide a way to select *exactly* C++11, not a later, available version? 2) if th

[Interest] Diff between Qt-5.7.1 and Qt-5.8.0 on Android - Pointer Below the Cursor at Text Fields

Hi, Nexus-7 with Android-6 The same Qt app built with 5.7.1 works properly and with 5.8.0 appears a blue pointer down the cursor at text fields. The pointer is buggy and doesn't follow the cursor properly when positioning and re-positioning child-windows/popups. How to get rid from it? Were it

Re: [Interest] Support for Visual Studio 2017

Hi, we've uploaded a beta version of the Qt Visual Studio Tools extension to http://download.qt.io/development_releases/vsaddin . -- Karsten -Original Message- From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+karsten.heimrich=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Tom Isaacson Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Mä

[Interest] What is the status of Qt and MinGW 64 for Windows?

Hi, I would like to get a status update on what is the current thinking/planning regarding 64-bit applications on Windows using MinGW? I am fully aware of the MinGW-64-Bit page on the wiki, and have been following it for a while now. Although the page has a lot