22/04/21 20:38, Konstantin Shegunov:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 7:19 PM Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest
mailto:interest@qt-project.org>> wrote:
You should create a C++ layer (call it a "presentation" layer) that
sits
between your (possibly non-Qt) business logic and the UI. That layer
Spam detection software, running on the system "mx.qt-project.org",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
C
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 05:31:33PM +0100, Nuno Santos wrote:
>For me, the major benefit of Qml is speed. Before using Qml I’ve done a
>couple of years doing Qt Widgets. The glue code to make things work is a
>big pain.
Hi Nuno.
This is an interesting statement.
My personal experience
On 4/24/21 5:00 AM, Frank Mertens wrote:
IMX6UL is just a marketing name. Look it up. "UL" stands for ultra-low. It has
nothing in common with the IMX6 architecture. It is actually the first IMX7. It does not
have a GPU and surely you can run it on a battery. Ask your hardware guys. They know.
On 2021-04-25 13:56, André Pönitz wrote:
...
Hi Nuno.
This is an interesting statement.
My personal experience is exactly the opposite: By using Qt Quick one is
forced to use non-trivial amounts of glue code that is conceptually
unnecessary in the QWidget case.
As a concrete example: A while
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 2:21 PM Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest <
interest@qt-project.org> wrote:
> 22/04/21 20:38, Konstantin Shegunov:
> > Registering a struct/data class with the meta type system and/or
> > marshaling it over QVariant, just so it can be visible in QML isn't
> > that. Or things a
One thing I noticed contributing to this effect is that it is apparently
difficult to pass objects of "medium" complexity through the glue layer >
Simple stuff like integers and strings are fine (enums already get
interesting...), really complex stuff like QAbstractItemModels can be fine,
but for
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 06:41:17PM +0200, Ulf Hermann wrote:
> > One thing I noticed contributing to this effect is that it is apparently
> > difficult to pass objects of "medium" complexity through the glue layer
> > Simple stuff like integers and strings are fine (enums already get
> > interesti
You know that I do appreciate your work to make QML easier to use. However,
I am still not convinced that a custom language (especially one that does
not fit _that_ seamlessly to C++) is needed at all.
Well, that's the main point then. Any language that does the object
composition in a simpler
