Re: [Interest] MSVC not-the-latest: are you using it? why?

2023-01-26 Thread Hamish Moffatt via Interest
On 26/1/23 03:52, Thiago Macieira wrote: The reason I asked about VS2019, aside from the simple learning of many things I did not anticipate, is that we're seeing it have C++ compliance issues. This is not even C++20 or 17; it's a plain constexpr function that should have worked with C++14. Is

Re: [Interest] Tweaking a static build of Qt 6 for Windows

2023-01-26 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 26 January 2023 07:52:38 PST Nuno Santos wrote: > When building Qt 6, is this the same place for this type of settings or the > fact that the build is managed by cmake this files are ignored and others > are used. If so, which ones? I suggest you reconsider. The runtime that MSVC 2015

Re: [Interest] Tweaking a static build of Qt 6 for Windows

2023-01-26 Thread Marius Kittler
When it comes to building a static version of Qt itself then you need to adjust things on CMake-level, indeed. When your project is still using qmake, then qmake's "mkspecs" are supposedly still relevant for building your project. (I cannot say much about that because I'm using CMake in all my

[Interest] Tweaking a static build of Qt 6 for Windows

2023-01-26 Thread Nuno Santos
Hi, When I used to compile Qt 5 statically for Windows I would usually need to tweak a couple of settings under: qtbase/mkspecs/common/msvc_desktop.conf QMAKE_CFLAGS_RELEASE = -O2 -MT -Zc:strictStrings QMAKE_CFLAGS_RELEASE_WITH_DEBUGINFO += -O2 -MT -Zi -Zc:strictStrings QMAKE_CFLAGS_DEBUG = -Zi