Re: [Interest] 5.4.2 Android Misery just one typo away

2015-06-16 Thread Sascha Cunz
On 2015-06-15 19:10, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday 15 June 2015 10:17:48 mark diener wrote: >> It WILL compile on all the platforms, runs fine on OSX/IOS Simulator, >> but >> on Android it will surely DIE. > > In addition to what the others said, "run fine" is missing a > characterisation.

Re: [Interest] I am trying to compile Qt 4.8 with VS2010

2013-02-07 Thread Sascha Cunz
Am Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2013, 08:45:57 schrieb Till Oliver Knoll: > Am 07.02.2013 um 02:59 schrieb Scott Aron Bloom : > > Just a suggestion... > > > > If you use a "Project" directory, for source and building, add that > > directory to your virus system as a white listed directory, ie don't > >

Re: [Interest] I am trying to compile Qt 4.8 with VS2010

2013-02-06 Thread Sascha Cunz
Am Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2013, 21:28:24 schrieb Guido Seifert: > > What's the path for your qt source and binary directory then? Might be > > that > > some absolute path used by the mkdir and cd during compilation are too > > long. > > This sounds interesting and something I could try. Though I don

Re: [Interest] I am trying to compile Qt 4.8 with VS2010

2013-02-06 Thread Sascha Cunz
Am Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2013, 21:08:26 schrieb Guido Seifert: > I am the 1%. I don't have a virus scanner. :-) > > > 99% of the time, this is due to a virus scanner scanning the file and > > denying access while it does so. What's the path for your qt source and binary directory then? Might be th

Re: [Interest] Qt5 +CLR -> linker error LNK2005

2013-02-05 Thread Sascha Cunz
Hello Franz, Am Montag, 4. Februar 2013, 10:49:59 schrieb Franz Hirschbeck: > Hello, > > In one of our projects we are using managed c++ together with Qt. After > porting the code to Qt5 the following linker error occurs. This happens > in every combination VS2008/2010 and win32/x64. > > 1>file2

Re: [Interest] calling QMessageBox::warning() may break the DLL detaching on VS2010

2012-11-15 Thread Sascha Cunz
Am Freitag, 16. November 2012, 09:57:26 schrieb Andrew Xu: > Sorry, the previous mail is not complete. continue... > > 5. As you memtioned, there is a static local object in the foo(), the > destructor of MyObj should be called when the program exiting. >1) If the QMessageBox::warning() were n

Re: [Interest] calling QMessageBox::warning() may break the DLL detaching on VS2010

2012-11-15 Thread Sascha Cunz
> I'm amazed that window related calls like ::MessageBox are even allowed in > DllMain, I certainly wouldn't expect them to work! Actually, they aren't - and that for a good reason. If it works, it's plainly by accident. Rationale: Creating a HWND in Windows might trigger the loading of DLLs.

Re: [Interest] Fwd: how to run 21 threads concurrently

2012-10-05 Thread Sascha Cunz
end_ of UNRSTParser::ProcessZLayer. That's why I put a helper-class into my example. Doing it here renders the Semaphore useless - Because you want the below acquire() to _block until all QFutures are finished_. > values += (nX*nY); > > } > > mSemaphore1.acquire(nZ); > >

Re: [Interest] how to run 21 threads concurrently

2012-10-04 Thread Sascha Cunz
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012, 00:35:44 schrieb Sujan Dasmahapatra: > which loop? > for(int th=0; th { > if(Threads[th].isRunning()) > Threads[th].waitForFinished(); > Threads[th].cancel(); > } > Threads.clear(); > > This loop is correct. If threads is running wait, then cancel it. braces > are prop

Re: [Interest] how to run 21 threads concurrently

2012-10-04 Thread Sascha Cunz
Hi Sujan, your threads don't output all data to disk, because you forgot some curly braces in the second loop. Sascha Am Donnerstag, 4. Oktober 2012, 16:21:10 schrieb Sujan Dasmahapatra: > I am not able to run my threads concurrently please help. > How can I run 21 threads concurrently and get

Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia

2012-08-15 Thread Sascha Cunz
On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 08:06:08 AM Atlant Schmidt wrote: Atlant: > And the "indirect sales value" matters not a > whit to the owner of the software (or the > shareholders of the owner) unless the owner > is actively reaping a significant fraction > of that "indirect sales value" (w