Hi,
I asked a question about the missing GTK theme a few months ago. I was
informed that it was no longer provided within Qt and was available
using the qtstyleplugins package. However, qtstyleplugins only provides
a style called "gtk2" and this is not compatible (I believe) with the
native
Em domingo, 16 de abril de 2017, às 03:23:42 PDT, Dan Allen escreveu:
> I asked a question about the missing GTK theme a few months ago. I was
> informed that it was no longer provided within Qt and was available
> using the qtstyleplugins package
Your information was wrong.
--
Thiago Macieira -
Not really sure how that helps Thiago? If you know it's incorrect,
would it not be more beneficial to provide the correct information?
Whats a little strange, is it was yourself that informed me at the time
(unless I have misunderstood what you've written (see below)):
On sábado, 28 de janei
Em domingo, 16 de abril de 2017, às 11:59:11 PDT, Dan Allen escreveu:
> Not really sure how that helps Thiago? If you know it's incorrect,
> would it not be more beneficial to provide the correct information?
Sure.
The Gtk3 style and platform theme is still part of Qt. It's in qtbase.
--
Thiag
Thiago,
Could you advise how I use the style?
On 17/04/17 00:06, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Em domingo, 16 de abril de 2017, às 11:59:11 PDT, Dan Allen escreveu:
Not really sure how that helps Thiago? If you know it's incorrect,
would it not be more beneficial to provide the correct information?
Em domingo, 16 de abril de 2017, às 23:42:38 PDT, Dan Allen escreveu:
> Thiago,
>
> Could you advise how I use the style?
The platform theme should be automatically enabled if you're using a GTK-based
desktop environment. Please run qtdiag and see what it says about "Theme"
(which I've just fix
Thiago,
I believe the platform theme is being enabled. However, it doesn't look
like the style is. The output for the theme section from qtdiag is:
Theme:
Available: gtk3,gnome,generic
Styles : fusion,windows
Icon theme : Adwaita, from /usr/share/icons,/usr/share/pixmaps
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Dan Allen wrote:
> I believe the platform theme is being enabled. However, it doesn't look
> like the style is.
There's no gtk3 style.
Regards,
Sérgio Martins
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://l
I'm going around in circles then Sergio.
My initial query was:
"So I guess my question is, will a GTK style that is compatible with the
default GTK3 platform theme be re-introduced into a future version of Qt
such that applications run in Ubuntu Gnome with a native look and feel?
Or worse ca
Em segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017, às 10:19:25 PDT, Dan Allen escreveu:
> I'm going around in circles then Sergio.
No, you're not. I'm the one who got confused. There's a platform theme and a
widget style. They're not the same thing.
> "So I guess my question is, will a GTK style that is com
Hi Thiago,
Thanks for the information.
Could you please confirm I've understood it correctly:
1. There's currently no way to achieve a native look and feel using
Qt5.8 in Ubuntu Unity or Gnome (i.e. GTK3 platform theme and style) with
or without qtstyleplugins.
2. This is something that wil
On segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017 11:01:48 PDT Dan Allen wrote:
> Hi Thiago,
>
> Thanks for the information.
>
> Could you please confirm I've understood it correctly:
>
> 1. There's currently no way to achieve a native look and feel using
> Qt5.8 in Ubuntu Unity or Gnome (i.e. GTK3 platform
Den 18 apr. 2017 6:46 fm skrev "Thiago Macieira" :
>
> On segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017 11:01:48 PDT Dan Allen wrote:
> > Hi Thiago,
> >
> > Thanks for the information.
> >
> > Could you please confirm I've understood it correctly:
> >
> > 1. There's currently no way to achieve a native look a
Den 18 apr. 2017 8:44 fm skrev "Elvis Stansvik" :
>
> Den 18 apr. 2017 6:46 fm skrev "Thiago Macieira" <
thiago.macie...@intel.com>:
> >
> > On segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017 11:01:48 PDT Dan Allen wrote:
> > > Hi Thiago,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the information.
> > >
> > > Could you please conf
Em segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017, às 23:44:06 PDT, Elvis Stansvik
escreveu:
> Den 18 apr. 2017 6:46 fm skrev "Thiago Macieira" > > 2. This is something that will be rectified in a future Qt release.
> >
> > Use the one from Fedora developers.
>
> Do you mean as a temporary solution, or are
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> Em segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017, às 23:44:06 PDT, Elvis Stansvik
> escreveu:
>> Den 18 apr. 2017 6:46 fm skrev "Thiago Macieira" > > > 2. This is something that will be rectified in a future Qt release.
>> >
>> > Use the one from Fedo
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Mark Gaiser wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Thiago Macieira
> wrote:
>> Em segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017, às 23:44:06 PDT, Elvis Stansvik
>> escreveu:
>>> Den 18 apr. 2017 6:46 fm skrev "Thiago Macieira" >> > > 2. This is something that will be rec
Hi Thiago,
As a worse case, I'd be happy to use the gtk2 style. However, as I
stated in my original post, this doesn't appear to be compatible with
the gtk3 platform theme. This means I'd have to use the gtk2 platform
theme and that doesn't give a native look and feel in the latest
versions o
Den 18 apr. 2017 8:59 fm skrev "Thiago Macieira" :
>
> Em segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017, às 23:44:06 PDT, Elvis Stansvik
> escreveu:
> > Den 18 apr. 2017 6:46 fm skrev "Thiago Macieira" <
thiago.macie...@intel.com
> > > > 2. This is something that will be rectified in a future Qt release.
> >
Em terça-feira, 18 de abril de 2017, às 01:42:10 PDT, Mark Gaiser escreveu:
> But this changed some half year ago [1] since they had issues they
> "could not resolve otherwise"...
That's Qt's fault, for requiring basically that such plugins use private API
that is not kept stable across versions
Em terça-feira, 18 de abril de 2017, às 09:10:44 PDT, Elvis Stansvik escreveu:
> Right, unless the style plugin is naughty and using private headers
> (like I think eg Breeze is doing).
I don't think they can avoid it. The entire QPA plugin API is private.
This you can complain to Qt developers.
Em terça-feira, 18 de abril de 2017, às 08:36:34 PDT, Dan Allen escreveu:
> I did not mean temporary. It's permanent as long as the developers of this
> platform theme plugin do not decide to submit their code to Qt. It's their
> project, they can do whatever they want with it. Now, I don't know if
Thanks Thiago.
That looks like it solves the problem.
On 18/04/17 18:03, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Em terça-feira, 18 de abril de 2017, às 08:36:34 PDT, Dan Allen escreveu:
I did not mean temporary. It's permanent as long as the developers of this
platform theme plugin do not decide to submit th
Den 18 apr. 2017 7:01 em skrev "Thiago Macieira" :
>
> Em terça-feira, 18 de abril de 2017, às 09:10:44 PDT, Elvis Stansvik
escreveu:
> > Right, unless the style plugin is naughty and using private headers
> > (like I think eg Breeze is doing).
>
> I don't think they can avoid it. The entire QPA pl
24 matches
Mail list logo
