09.07.2015, 08:25, "Thiago Macieira" :
> On Wednesday 08 July 2015 21:56:42 Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>> It does not support many C++ features:
>>
>> http://www.copperspice.com/docs/cs_overview/moc_limits.html
>>
>> However, in clang-based moc it would be possible to support all of this
>> st
On Wednesday 08 July 2015 21:56:42 Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> It does not support many C++ features:
>
> http://www.copperspice.com/docs/cs_overview/moc_limits.html
>
> However, in clang-based moc it would be possible to support all of this
> stuff
No, it wouldn't. Not if you're thinking of a c
On Wednesday 08 July 2015 22:08:18 Igor Mironchik wrote:
> With Qt 5.4.1 I had a problem with moc. One my QObject-derived class was
> declared in source file (.cpp) and this source file at the end included
> #include "source.moc". And what I had... When I run qmake and make from
> command prompt
Elvis Stansvik schreef op 8-7-2015 om 22:51:
>
> Perhaps not related to the question discussed here, but what I've
> actually missed sometimes is to be able to make a class template that
> is also a QObject (including Q_OBJECT macro). I'm not sure moc can
> handle that, at least not fully. If mo
2015-07-08 22:21 GMT+02:00 Till Oliver Knoll :
>
> Am 08.07.15 um 20:56 schrieb Konstantin Tokarev:
> >
> >
> > 08.07.2015, 21:26, "Till Oliver Knoll" :
> >>> Am 08.07.2015 um 08:57 schrieb Igor Mironchik <
> igor.mironc...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Does anybody know if Qt plans t
Am 08.07.15 um 20:56 schrieb Konstantin Tokarev:
>
>
> 08.07.2015, 21:26, "Till Oliver Knoll" :
>>> Am 08.07.2015 um 08:57 schrieb Igor Mironchik :
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Does anybody know if Qt plans to remove moc in the future releases, let's
>>> say in Qt 6?
>>
>> What's wrong with moc? :)
>
On 08.07.2015 22:19, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
> 08.07.2015, 22:08, "Igor Mironchik" :
>> Hi.
>>
>> On 08.07.2015 21:26, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
Am 08.07.2015 um 08:57 schrieb Igor Mironchik :
Hi,
Does anybody know if Qt plans to remove moc in the future releases
> What's wrong with moc? :)
>
> Seriously, while in the very beginning I was doubtful about an "additional
> build step that messes around with my source" moc never got into my way. Even
> with Visual Studio 6 and the corresponding Qt VS Addon back in the days one
> hardly noticed the presence
08.07.2015, 22:08, "Igor Mironchik" :
> Hi.
>
> On 08.07.2015 21:26, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>>> Am 08.07.2015 um 08:57 schrieb Igor Mironchik :
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Does anybody know if Qt plans to remove moc in the future releases, let's
>>> say in Qt 6?
>> What's wrong with moc? :)
>>
>>
Hi.
On 08.07.2015 21:26, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>
>> Am 08.07.2015 um 08:57 schrieb Igor Mironchik :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anybody know if Qt plans to remove moc in the future releases, let's
>> say in Qt 6?
> What's wrong with moc? :)
>
> Seriously, while in the very beginning I was doubtful ab
08.07.2015, 21:26, "Till Oliver Knoll" :
>> Am 08.07.2015 um 08:57 schrieb Igor Mironchik :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anybody know if Qt plans to remove moc in the future releases, let's
>> say in Qt 6?
>
> What's wrong with moc? :)
>
> Seriously, while in the very beginning I was doubtful about a
ot;Till Oliver Knoll"
> To: "Qt Project"
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Is moc obsolete?
>
>
>
> > Am 08.07.2015 um 08:57 schrieb Igor Mironchik :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anybody know if Qt plans to remove moc in the future releases, let'
> Am 08.07.2015 um 08:57 schrieb Igor Mironchik :
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody know if Qt plans to remove moc in the future releases, let's say
> in Qt 6?
What's wrong with moc? :)
Seriously, while in the very beginning I was doubtful about an "additional
build step that messes around with my s
08.07.2015, 10:59, "André Somers" :
> Igor Mironchik schreef op 8-7-2015 om 09:40:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 08.07.2015 10:12, Dmitry Volosnykh wrote:
>>> Igor, there was quite a hot discussion of this project in development
>>> mailing list. Follow here:
>>> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/develop
On 08.07.2015 10:58, André Somers wrote:
Igor Mironchik schreef op 8-7-2015 om 09:40:
Hi,
On 08.07.2015 10:12, Dmitry Volosnykh wrote:
Igor, there was quite a hot discussion of this project in
development mailing list. Follow here:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2015-June
Igor Mironchik schreef op 8-7-2015 om 09:40:
Hi,
On 08.07.2015 10:12, Dmitry Volosnykh wrote:
Igor, there was quite a hot discussion of this project in development
mailing list. Follow here:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2015-June/022164.html
Interesting, but I didn't fin
Hi,
On 08.07.2015 10:12, Dmitry Volosnykh wrote:
Igor, there was quite a hot discussion of this project in development
mailing list. Follow here:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2015-June/022164.html
Interesting, but I didn't find answer to my main question - about Qt
plans
Igor, there was quite a hot discussion of this project in development
mailing list. Follow here:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2015-June/022164.html
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Igor Mironchik
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody know if Qt plans to remove moc in the future rele
Hi,
Does anybody know if Qt plans to remove moc in the future releases,
let's say in Qt 6?
I found CopperSpice http://www.copperspice.com/ it's C++ library derived
from the existing Qt 4.8 framework.
And here some thoughts from Woboq about this topic
http://woboq.com/blog/reflection-in-cpp
19 matches
Mail list logo