Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I don't see any advantage to that at all.
The advantage would be to allow for completely different Exception
implementations while still beeing able to write a generic catch()
handler like
catch (Throwable $e) {}
(Which does not mean that I think this really use
Patch applied, thanks.
--Jani
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:01:22 +0300 (EEST)
>Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> It would work fine (dunno what you mean with "work" compile/using?)
>> if you really used HEAD..try gettin
Hi,
are there any plans about implementing the ability to provide throws for
abstract classes?
Example:
---s.cut---
abstract class RDBMS_Connection_Abstract
{
abstract public function connect() throws RDBMS_Connection_Exception;
}
class RDBMS_Connection extends RDBMS_Connection_Abstract
{
