Sorry to reply to my own mail.
Updated patch for a small clean up.
Please take the latest one.
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:20:37 -0700, "Kamesh Jayachandran"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi Derick,
> Thanks for responding.
> I am posting my patches module by module.
> Fo
Hi Derick,
Thanks for responding.
I am posting my patches module by module.
For zend you can find the patches at the following locations.
http://puggy.symonds.net/~kameshj/zendnetwarepatches.tar.gz
Let me know in case of any issues.
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:53:03 +0
Is the following patch correct in addressing the security fixes from
4.3.8 for 4.3.7?
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-- snip snip
--- ext/wddx/wddx.c.orig2003-10-20 10:42:10.0 -0500
+++ ext/wddx/wddx.c 2004-07-14 14:26:30.978747000 -0500
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
+---
Using the dsp. If the dsp files will not be supported, then they should
be removed.
Shane
Wez Furlong wrote:
Using .dsp build, or the new build system?
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:03:17 -0700, Shane Caraveo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
seems sqlite.w32.h did not get updated when sqlite was last updated
i`m still trying to do my first windows build. recently i stopped on
required files in 'bundle' directory. is there any way to get module
directly from cvs with this directory in it? i tried several methods (cvs
(two aliases at least :]), snaps.php.net) and never seem to get this nice
dir inside. a
Hello Andi,
that's absolutley stupid. You cannot force people here to fix bugs they
have no idea of by just not branching. Also you ignore every little habit
we developed in the past. That does not let us look professional.
marcus
Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 6:08:15 PM, you wrote:
> I think with
Hi guys,
first off congrats!! 'love what you've done with the place'!
I noticed a few references to PHP4 and PHP3 in the ini files , there are
probably other places too, which you may wish to update.
no biggy but I thought I'd mention it (spit and polish - if the metaphor
means anything to you.)
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, George Schlossnagle wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2004, at 6:37 AM, Ray Hilton wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > sorry for asking a question that has most likely been addressed a long
> > time ago, but what ever happened to apache_hooks and will it be
> > updated for apache2?
> >
> > Found so
I think with the fix Stefan just commited we'll probably release 5.0.1 in
the near future, depending on how many people are bitten by it.
I suggest waiting a few more days while continuing to submit bug reports
which we'll most likely be receiving in the coming days, and then branch
off the PHP_
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have patches against PHP5.0.0 to make PHP5.0.0 work for NetWare.
> What is the ideal way in which these changes can be merged in the CVS
> HEAD?
Can you please post a link to this patch here?
regards,
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP R
Hi All,
I have patches against PHP5.0.0 to make PHP5.0.0 work for NetWare.
What is the ideal way in which these changes can be merged in the CVS
HEAD?
I have small patches against 68 files.
a) Is it advisable to send all 68 patches in one single patch?
b) Is it advisable to categorize the patches l
Hi,
Now handle member of zend_module_entry is getting populated(see php_dl
function inside the ext/standard/dl.c).
But it will not help as it should be set before calling
zend_register_module_ex.(As this function copies the whole
zend_module_entry to module_registry which is later used when trying
On Jul 14, 2004, at 6:37 AM, Ray Hilton wrote:
Hi all,
sorry for asking a question that has most likely been addressed a long
time ago, but what ever happened to apache_hooks and will it be
updated for apache2?
Found some old stuff about php 4.2 and apache 1.3 and it seemed like a
nice idea...
I would say to wait 2 or 3 weeks.
This time is not critical for the code that is laying aside for months.
In my opinion the bug system will start to fill up with new bugs in
the next days or 2-3 weeks. Some percentage of these bugs will be
easy to fix. If the branch happens now, a bug hunter has to
You mean we haven't created a branch for 5.0 ??
Let's do it ASAP; I noticed a few changes since the release... what
happened to the release process??
Let's branch PHP_5_0 and make HEAD 5.1-dev.
--Wez.
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:41:03 +0200 (CEST), Derick Rethans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> New feat
Let me first say that I'm glad you guys allow us lurkers lurking about.
I've managed to learn a huge amount just watching the process you went
through to bring PHP5 to fruition. I can honestly say that while it's
been a ton of reading (and of course I didn't read all of it), it's been
very
infor
On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 07:43, Christian Stocker wrote:
> > New features should go to 5.1.x and fixes/small additions to 5.0.1...
> > but there is no branch yet. I think we need to make one. What about
> > others?
To my knowledge it was agreed a long time ago that 5.0 would be released
and branched
On 14.7.2004 10:41 Uhr, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Christian Stocker wrote:
Morning
After PHP 5.0.0 is now released, are there any plans for opening up HEAD
for not-only-bug-fixes again?
Do we branch (or is it already) PHP_5_0 and allow only bugfixes there
(as with 4.3) and HEAD w
(applies to 4.3 branch)
--- ext/standard/tests/strings/strip_tags.phpt 27 Nov 2002 06:20:37 - 1.1.2.1
+++ ext/standard/tests/strings/strip_tags.phpt 14 Jul 2004 11:07:58 -
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
echo strip_tags('NEAT STUFF');
echo "\n";
echo strip_tags('TESTS ?!!
Developing the PHP runtime
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi all,
sorry for asking a question that has most likely been addressed a long
time ago, but what ever happened to apache_hooks and will it be updated
for apache2?
Found some old stuff about php 4.2 and apache 1.3 and it seemed like a
nice idea... anyone know of its fate?
--
Ray Hilton
-
Memef
> Just commited what should be a fix. Please try next snapshot.
looks fine - thanks :)
rash
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Alle 10:51, mercoledì 14 luglio 2004, Derick Rethans ha scritto:
> We can decide that for ourselves, thank you very much.
Thanks to Stefan Esser that seems just fixed this.
Alex
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
unfourtunately the security patch for 5.0.0 was broken in one Apache1
specific part. Basic auth does not detect that username+password was given.
PHP 4.3.x is not affected because that patch did not go into it (yet).
Stefan
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscrib
Using .dsp build, or the new build system?
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:03:17 -0700, Shane Caraveo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> seems sqlite.w32.h did not get updated when sqlite was last updated, so
> you cannot build a clean php5 on win32. The culprit is the
> SQLITE_NOTADB define. hacking it in at
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Alex Pagnoni wrote:
> Alle 10:41, mercoledì 14 luglio 2004, Derick Rethans ha scritto:
>
> > New features should go to 5.1.x and fixes/small additions to 5.0.1...
>
> I think one of the first 5.0.1 fixes should be about this bug:
> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29132
We can
Alle 10:41, mercoledì 14 luglio 2004, Derick Rethans ha scritto:
> New features should go to 5.1.x and fixes/small additions to 5.0.1...
I think one of the first 5.0.1 fixes should be about this bug:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29132
Many applications broken due to this, I'm not the one who r
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Christian Stocker wrote:
> Morning
>
> After PHP 5.0.0 is now released, are there any plans for opening up HEAD
> for not-only-bug-fixes again?
> Do we branch (or is it already) PHP_5_0 and allow only bugfixes there
> (as with 4.3) and HEAD will become 5.1 later?
> Or is HEAD
Morning
After PHP 5.0.0 is now released, are there any plans for opening up HEAD
for not-only-bug-fixes again?
Do we branch (or is it already) PHP_5_0 and allow only bugfixes there
(as with 4.3) and HEAD will become 5.1 later?
Or is HEAD for the being still the "stable" branch until we fixed the
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Robert Janeczek wrote:
> > Windows build from the CVS as of 6:00 GMT:
> >
> > http://www.php.net/~edink/php-5.0.0-Win32-prerelease-test.zip
>
> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29025 is still present
It's set to "Open", isn't it?
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Develop
30 matches
Mail list logo
