Maintain the documentation in Malay Language,
Assisting in the develoment of PHP runtime
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello Marian,
fixed and thanks for the heads up.
best regards
marcus
Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 12:12:28 PM, you wrote:
> 5.1.3 snap news file contains the following fragment:
> - Improved SPL: (Marcus)
> - Fixed issues with not/double calling of constructors of SPL iterators.
> - Fixed i
Hello Wez,
just to continue on this nice argument: Jump reminds me of the worst
addition to c ever: longjump.
marcus
Friday, March 10, 2006, 2:36:56 PM, you wrote:
> My vote is +1 for goto, just because that largely describes what it
> does and how it is used. I don't mind if it winds up be
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
After poking this a bit more, it looks like this whole block of code in
main.c is redundant. Here is the story:
We start our journey on a dark and stormy night in June 2002 with this
bug: http://bugs.php.net/17720
This led to this fix:
http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/
After poking this a bit more, it looks like this whole block of code in
main.c is redundant. Here is the story:
We start our journey on a dark and stormy night in June 2002 with this
bug: http://bugs.php.net/17720
This led to this fix:
http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/php-src/main/main.c?r1=
On Mar 10, 2006, at 1:57 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Are you sure VCWD_REALPATH doesn't use the realpath cache? It did
last time I checked and I think is still the right method to use
there...
quite
#define VCWD_REALPATH(path, real_path) realpath(pa
+1 for goto
-1 for jump
Wez Furlong wrote:
My vote is +1 for goto, just because that largely describes what it
does and how it is used. I don't mind if it winds up being called
jump, I just think it will be easier for people to find it when they
need it if it is called 'goto'. 'goto' also c
My vote is +1 for goto, just because that largely describes what it
does and how it is used. I don't mind if it winds up being called
jump, I just think it will be easier for people to find it when they
need it if it is called 'goto'. 'goto' also comes with all the usual
anti-goto propaganda that
or "goto: goto jump"
On 3/9/06, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For such people we might have a page in the manual saying:
> goto: see jump
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 10:07:46 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bastian Grupe) wrote:
> Steph Fox wrote:
> > Zeev's
> > nightmare scenario re new users and spaghetti code has a good
> > chance of coming true. It's the one command just about everyone's
> > heard of.
> >
> > - Steph
>
> If you look at the
On 3/10/06, Dmitry Stogov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> If you like "goto" instead of "jump", please open yet another vote.
> I am indifferent with name.
Why vote again? Your original call was using "goto"... anyway +1 for"goto"
--Pierre
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailin
> If you like "goto" instead of "jump", please open yet another vote.
> I am indifferent with name.
Let's call it goto.
- Sascha
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Guys,
If you like "goto" instead of "jump", please open yet another vote.
I am indifferent with name.
Thanks. Dmitry.
> -Original Message-
> From: Edin Kadribasic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 2:52 PM
> To: Derick Rethans
> Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List
> Su
Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>
>
>> Log:
>> Implemented "jump label" operator (limited "goto")
>
>
> I don't think we decided on the name "jump" actually. I would really
> recommend to call this "goto" as that what it is and what people expect
> it to be
Steph Fox wrote:
Zeev's
nightmare scenario re new users and spaghetti code has a good chance of
coming true. It's the one command just about everyone's heard of.
- Steph
If you look at the scripts in the wild, this scenario is already very
present and one of the reasons things like register
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Log:
> Implemented "jump label" operator (limited "goto")
I don't think we decided on the name "jump" actually. I would really
recommend to call this "goto" as that what it is and what people expect
it to be called. Calling it jump is silly.
Deri
16 matches
Mail list logo