PHP 4 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
Num Status Summary (630 total including feature requests)
===[*General Issues]==
40497 Feedback File-Upload does not work
===[*Programming Da
PHP 5 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
Num Status Summary (664 total including feature requests)
===[*Compile Issues]==
39372 Suspended Incompatibility in the PHP API.
===[*Configur
PHP 6 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
Num Status Summary (43 total including feature requests)
===[*General Issues]==
26771 Suspended register_tick_funtions crash under threaded webservers
27372 Verified parse error loadin
Hi,
I'd like to suggest a change to how the read_property object handler operates.
Wouldn't it be reasonable for the engine to use get_property_ptr_ptr() whenever
it wants to modify a property and get rid of using read_property() for write
access?
That would make rather simple ops like concatena
Hello,
Does that fix the problem where:
$object->theArray[] = (...);
is invalid when 'theArray' is implemented using __get()?
Whoever fixes that one could get all free drinks at PHP conferences:
PHP Hacker: "Hi, I'm the guy who made it so you can add items to an array which
is returned throu
On 02/19/2007 02:23 PM, Peter Hodge wrote:
Hello,
Does that fix the problem where:
$object->theArray[] = (...);
is invalid when 'theArray' is implemented using __get()?
Whoever fixes that one could get all free drinks at PHP conferences:
PHP Hacker: "Hi, I'm the guy who made it so you can
Peter Hodge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does that fix the problem where:
>
> $object->theArray[] = (...);
>
> is invalid when 'theArray' is implemented using __get()?
No. It's about internal classes and information stored in C structures.
Regards,
--
Michael
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Develop
--- Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/19/2007 02:23 PM, Peter Hodge wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does that fix the problem where:
> >
> > $object->theArray[] = (...);
> >
> > is invalid when 'theArray' is implemented using __get()?
> >
> > Whoever fixes that one could get all fr
On 02/19/2007 02:42 PM, Peter Hodge wrote:
--- Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I believe you can start buying drinks for Dmitry =)
Is that in 5.2.1?
Yes.
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
Checking if this form is working
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
To develop SCA components in SDO/SCA
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello everybody!
As a webhost that offer PHP-support for hundreds of customers, I have a
concern.
The mail()-function is too easy to use for sending spam and even worse -
there is (sometimes) almost impossible to trace the sender-account.
I've been looking into the source code and one very easy
Kristoffer Hultenius wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> As a webhost that offer PHP-support for hundreds of customers, I have a
> concern.
> The mail()-function is too easy to use for sending spam and even worse -
> there is (sometimes) almost impossible to trace the sender-account.
You can solve th
Hello Antony,
Friday, February 16, 2007, 11:39:00 AM, you wrote:
> On 02/16/2007 01:21 AM, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>> We also can add a detailed description of what is release candidate, what's
>> the difference comparing to a release etc. to qa.php.net
>> and add a link to that page in the block.
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 01:30:55PM +0100, Kristoffer Hultenius wrote:
>
> As a webhost that offer PHP-support for hundreds of customers, I have a
> concern.
> The mail()-function is too easy to use for sending spam and even worse -
> there is (sometimes) almost impossible to trace the sender-acc
On 02/19/2007 08:40 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Release candidates are development packages released to check if any critical
problems have slipped into the code during the previous development period.
Release candidates are NOT for production use, they are for testing purposes
only
even though in
Hello Antony,
Monday, February 19, 2007, 7:12:27 PM, you wrote:
> On 02/19/2007 08:40 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>>> Release candidates are development packages released to check if any
>>> critical
>>> problems have slipped into the code during the previous development period.
>>> Release candid
On 02/19/2007 10:01 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Antony,
Monday, February 19, 2007, 7:12:27 PM, you wrote:
On 02/19/2007 08:40 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Release candidates are development packages released to check if any critical
problems have slipped into the code during the previous dev
Antony Dovgal write:
> > On 02/19/2007 08:40 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> > If they only help us they wouldn't do anything. So we need to make
> > clear that they help themselves by running the tests and
> their own software.
>
> Well, saying that they help only themselves is not true.
"You can
19 matches
Mail list logo