Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List (Summary)

2007-09-15 Thread Ilia Alshanetsky
On 15-Sep-07, at 7:18 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: Hi! Thanks for organizing the things! NP ;-) Btw the detailed breakdown of the votes is available here http://bb.prohost.org/53Features.pdf What we do wih "low score" ones? I think it's good to note that -1 and +1 isn't the same as tw

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List (Summary)

2007-09-15 Thread Stanislav Malyshev
Hi! Thanks for organizing the things! What we do wih "low score" ones? I think it's good to note that -1 and +1 isn't the same as two 0's... Will the TODO be on http://oss.backendmedia.com/PhP53? For the most part it seems that there is a general consensus on the features to go into PHP 5.3,

[PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List (Summary)

2007-09-15 Thread Ilia Alshanetsky
Just over a week has passed since the suggested list of features for PHP 5.3 was posted and it looks like all of the people who wanted to throw in their votes managed to do so. My thanks to all of the people who voted and kept the discussion on track. Here is the end result of all the hoopl

[PHP-DEV] Re: RFC: mark functions as const for possible optimizations

2007-09-15 Thread Peter Brodersen
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:01:13 +0100, in php.internals [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Nuno Lopes") wrote: >My proposal is the following: >some functions when fed with constant arguments always return a constant >value, too. e.g.: >strlen('abcd') === 4. I like the general idea. Would there be some caveats wi