I'm getting persistent const qualifier warnings with MSVC 2005 Express,
along these lines:
..\extra\uriparser\uriparser.c(227) : warning C4090: 'function' :
different 'const' qualifiers
where line 227 looks like
add_next_index_stringl(path_array, walker->text.first,
walker->text.afterLast - walk
Anonymous functions as you know them today come from lambda calculus which
was created before computers were even made. Generally it is agreed anon
func == labmda can be used interchangeably.
Most developers will understand what:
public function lambda sowat () { return function OR lambda, whateve
But anonymous functions and lambda expressions are not the same thing...
David
Am 27.04.2008 um 02:11 schrieb Chris Stockton:
*cough* lambda *cough*
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 4:26 PM, David Zülke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Am 27.04.2008 um 00:24 schrieb Nathan Nobbe:
On Sat, Apr 26, 200
*cough* lambda *cough*
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 4:26 PM, David Zülke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 27.04.2008 um 00:24 schrieb Nathan Nobbe:
>
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, David Zülke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Wouldn't the most consistent way be to omit "function" altogether whe
Am 27.04.2008 um 00:24 schrieb Nathan Nobbe:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, David Zülke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Wouldn't the most consistent way be to omit "function" altogether
when
using a return type hint?
public static function zomg() {
return $somethingArbitrary;
}
public stati
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, David Zülke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't the most consistent way be to omit "function" altogether when
> using a return type hint?
>
> public static function zomg() {
> return $somethingArbitrary;
> }
>
> public static string foo() {
> return $mustBeStri
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Dhiru Pandey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [My apologies if I am posting on the wrong group...please point me to the
> right one]
>
> I am trying to figure out a way to invoke PHP functions directly i.e.
> bypassing the PHP compiler (scanner and parser). For now it
Edward Z. Yang wrote:
> Callback works with the native C functions too. It'll be pretty nasty
> trying to get all of PHP's macros to work from scratch. Just use the
> infrastructure that's in place already.
Sorry about the double-post; I should clarify: I mean that callback
works with PHP function
Dhiru Pandey wrote:
> Thanks for responding.
>
> May be I mis-wrote.
> What I would really like is a way to call the native c functions of the
> php implementation directly (bypassing the PHP compiler) like:
>
> PHP_FUNCTION(str_repeat)
> PHP_FUNCTION(addcslashes) etc.
>
> In other words I woul
Thanks for responding.
May be I mis-wrote.
What I would really like is a way to call the native c functions of the php
implementation directly (bypassing the PHP compiler) like:
PHP_FUNCTION(str_repeat)
PHP_FUNCTION(addcslashes) etc.
In other words I would like to invoke this functions direct
Dhiru Pandey wrote:
> I am trying to figure out a way to invoke PHP functions directly i.e.
> bypassing the PHP compiler (scanner and parser). For now it would be
> great if I can get some help calling them from C. Ultimately I would
> like to call them from Java.
It's not difficult to call PHP_FU
[My apologies if I am posting on the wrong group...please point me to
the right one]
I am trying to figure out a way to invoke PHP functions directly i.e.
bypassing the PHP compiler (scanner and parser). For now it would be
great if I can get some help calling them from C. Ultimately I would
l
Wouldn't the most consistent way be to omit "function" altogether when
using a return type hint?
public static function zomg() {
return $somethingArbitrary;
}
public static string foo() {
return $mustBeString;
}
otoh, should there ever be a type "function" (e.g. for anonymous
funcs) dow
Will work on detailed documentation and will write examples for the functions
in documentary and will work over it for transleting it to turkish.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I like the first too, if this can be implemented I think it is a
suitable syntax.
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 00:13 +0100, Alain Williams wrote:
> public function int doThing(string $foo) { return 1; }
>
> The above is the best (ie omit 'return' or 'returns').
>
> This also is consistent with C and wi
15 matches
Mail list logo
