Hi all,
This patch addresses the issue with the date() function. When passing in a
'u', the date() function simply outputs six zeros. To fix this, I added a
gettimeofday() call that figures out what to display for microseconds. I am
including the headers and using the function with
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Ilia Cheishvili
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
This patch addresses the issue with the date() function. When passing in a
'u', the date() function simply outputs six zeros. To fix this, I added a
gettimeofday() call that figures out what to display for
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Greg Beaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to respectfully disagree with both of you:
Stas: choosing an imperfect solution when a better one already exists is
just plain stupid, and isn't what you want *or* what you suggested - the
solution you, Liz, Marcus
I would definitely have to agree. I would much prefer to have a minimal
solution implemented and then to iterate over it in the future than to try
to figure out the perfect implementation the first time.
Just from watching where the thread about namespaces has gone, I would
definitely have to say
It definitely would be, and that's actually the way I would have preferred
to do it. I didn't want to impact too much code, if that makes sense in
this case, but I'm glad that someone agrees :)
I have attached a patch to do exactly this.
Ilia
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Alexey Zakhlestin
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Ilia Cheishvili
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It definitely would be, and that's actually the way I would have preferred
to do it. I didn't want to impact too much code, if that makes sense in
this case, but I'm glad that someone agrees :)
I have attached a patch
Ah, I see. I like that even better :)
And I attached yet another patch that incorporates your idea.
Ilia
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 2:20 AM, Alexey Zakhlestin [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Ilia Cheishvili
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It definitely would be, and that's
Hi Greg,
Steph: the limited solution proposed by Stas and company (removing
functions [and I would add constants]/fixing name resolution) *is* a
basic solution that can be expanded on. I outlined the steps in my
reply. It's the best solution to the problem, not an imperfect one. A
namespace
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Ilia Cheishvili
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, I see. I like that even better :)
And I attached yet another patch that incorporates your idea.
thanks.
I did some more code-digging, and it looks, like proper point for
fixing is not here, anyway.
It should be in
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Hannes Magnusson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 09:04, Ilia Cheishvili
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
This patch addresses the issue with the date() function. When passing in a
'u', the date() function simply outputs six zeros. To fix
Adding support for functions, constants and even variables is actually
quite do-able with the solution I suggested (different separator between
namespace name and function/constant/variable name) and can be added
easily.
Adding support for functions, constants and even variables is actually
jvlad wrote:
Adding support for functions, constants and even variables is actually
quite do-able with the solution I suggested (different separator between
namespace name and function/constant/variable name) and can be added
easily.
Adding support for functions, constants and even
I did some digging around in the code and came up with the solution that you
suggested. I put the fix in unixtime2tm.c, letting php_date.c remain the
nice abstraction layer between the system-dependent code of getting the time
and actually formatting it for display. The patch is attached.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 20:36, Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zoe wrote:
I have some PHP opcode documentation which might be useful, an html
version is linked here: http://www.zapt.info/opcodes.html.
Awesome work!!
Cool. I think the php-doc folks can help you come up with
14 matches
Mail list logo
