Hi Greg,
The patch I posted here:
http://pear.php.net/~greg/ns.element.patch.txt
does exactly what you are talking about. For some reason, some people
find this too difficult to digest. I've already expressed my opinion on
the matter (after all, I did spend almost a week developing the
+1, or: Do, or do not. There is no 'try.'
- David
On 28.09.2008, at 16:29, Steph Fox wrote:
Hi Greg,
The patch I posted here:
http://pear.php.net/~greg/ns.element.patch.txt
does exactly what you are talking about. For some reason, some
people
find this too difficult to digest. I've
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:07:10PM +0400, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Yes. Changing :: into any other separator solves the functions/static
methods and constants ambiguity, but it also breaks intuitive syntax.
Which is more important? Considering there have been threads upon
threads filled with
Steph Fox wrote:
I don't want to see that whole ns separator debate all over again any
more than you do, but I really don't see a good way to avoid it... sorry.
+1, I second this completely
From someone who *was* using namespaces developing against the 5.3
branch, this is going to happen
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 24.09.2008, at 01:17, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
For those that do not understand very well the explanation of jvlad...
He's suggesting to change the class struct to be an scope struct, and
have a property that tells if it's a namespace or a class, and reuse
the
There is a bug in stream_filter_remove() that calls the stream destructor
when it shouldn't. I have included two attachments--one is the patch to
streamsfuncs.c and the other is a test.
Take a look :)
Ilia
Index: streamsfuncs.c
===
hi Ilia!
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Ilia Cheishvili
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a bug in stream_filter_remove() that calls the stream destructor
when it shouldn't. I have included two attachments--one is the patch to
streamsfuncs.c and the other is a test.
Take a look :)
Wrong
Sorry for that! I transposed two characters. The right bug # is 46164.
I'll add the patch to the bug as well.
Ilia
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Pierre Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi Ilia!
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Ilia Cheishvili
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a bug in
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Ilia Cheishvili
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for that! I transposed two characters. The right bug # is 46164.
I'll add the patch to the bug as well.
Can you do it as well for your other patches please?
Cheers,
--
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net |
Daniel Convissor wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:07:10PM +0400, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Yes. Changing :: into any other separator solves the functions/static
methods and constants ambiguity, but it also breaks intuitive syntax.
Which is more important? Considering there have been threads
Hi,
The second highest vote was :::, but there was strong objection to this
as well from some. The problem, I still believe, is that we are focused
on having the same:::stupid:::operator:::between:::everything.
The truth is that in source files, there is a clear boundary between
namespace
11 matches
Mail list logo