Hi!
--stas_s->option->because_I_could_not_read_that_code;
Can't or won't? :) I have very hard time to believe you don't know what
-> means.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
(408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP
(This is a repost of a proposal originally sent to the list 6 months
ago. It didn't gather much attention back then, but I talked to several
people off-list who found it useful and suggested that I should try to
bring it up again at a later date - so here goes)
When a header has been set using
Hi,
I think zend_hash_compare could get a healthy speed boost in some
cases if first it would check whether the two variables passed to it
are actually the same (because of "reference counting"). Sorry, my C
skills are way too rusty to write the patch which is likely to be just
a few lines long.
Jessie Hernandez wrote:
Hi Greg,
I've read through the posts and the RFC and am not sure if this was
discussed before, but there is one other proposal I'd like to throw out
there: why not require all classes that are inside namespaces to be
explicitly imported? This would follow the AS3 appr
Greg Beaver wrote:
Hi,
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaceissues
Read it and discuss. Let's be clear people: the technical problems in
namespaces are limited and solvable. The problems in the political
environment surrounding them may not be. Wouldn't politics be a
stupid-ass reason to remove
Hi,
First of all, thanks for reviewing and the feedback. I knew this wasn't
perfect, and tried to understand what was previously done for __get and
__set and transport that to the static counterparts. Unfortunately not all
"infrastructure" like the std_*_property_handler callbacks is in place f
Hi Lester,
And there are no problems with those on foreign keyboards?
If there are, those foreign keyboards are unable to offer either escaped
chars or MS paths... which seems highly unlikely.
But do I still understand that there is an alternative method that was not
part of this last roun
Hello David,
Sunday, October 19, 2008, 1:02:21 PM, you wrote:
>>> shift+;(x3) vs \
>>
> Ok I'll try to make a very neutral comment. For the moment most are
> still using an english keyboard (no matter which english in this case
> and I'd actually be interested in knowing numbers for a fact
>>>
>> shift+;(x3) vs \
>
Ok I'll try to make a very neutral comment. For the moment most are
still using an english keyboard (no matter which english in this case
and I'd actually be interested in knowing numbers for a fact if
anyone's got something) and ergonomically speaking, ::: is much easier
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Greg was so kind to give me part of his awesome upcoming Pyrus code. He
actually has it running with both ':::' and '\' as namespace separators.
So I thought I'd help out a tiny tiny bit by giving you all the choice of
having a look at actual working code:
shift+;(x3) vs
10 matches
Mail list logo