Okay... Pierre had recommended I upload the patches to that bug report when I
first got started. I just finished getting the last of the hard stuff working
tonight. The patch is pretty big (though the 200k may have had a lot of
white-space changes).
It may also be so big because that patch in
2012/1/28 Ángel González :
> On 28/01/12 03:05, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>>
>> There is a 100k limit, but the error message you are getting indicates
>> that you aren't actually hitting that limitation. The server config has
>> a 2M limit, so you should be fitting well within that. I'm not sure how
>>
As noted on bug #60887 SOAP does not send the user-agent field when
requesting the wsdl
Subsequent requests are
Is this a normal behavior? Or the request to the WSDL should also include
the User-Agent field?
Please comment to determine if patch should be applied or not to include
the field in the
Hey Dmitry, could you take a look at this one. I think this is mostly
your code and I am a bit lost in the path manipulation that is going on
here. This is bug https://bugs.php.net/51860 and it can be reproduced
from cli like this:
% cd /
% ln -s / phptest
% echo "OK" > /phpfile
% echo ' /phpinc
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Justin Martin wrote:
> Someone actually just pointed out to me that if(-1) returns true. In that
> case, I suppose my suggestion doesn't quite work.
>
> The reason I suggest this is that I suspect people will constantly be
> looking up what the constants are called
On 28/01/12 03:05, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
There is a 100k limit, but the error message you are getting indicates
that you aren't actually hitting that limitation. The server config has
a 2M limit, so you should be fitting well within that. I'm not sure how
your 200k patch is hittig that "file is e
> Someone actually just pointed out to me that if(-1) returns true. In
> that case, I suppose my suggestion doesn't quite work.
Well, it still "works" depending on what conclusion you want to draw
in your local environment.
Sessions_disabled || yes_active_session might go through the same code
>
> BTW, I would recommend using Wiki and RFC for tracking new features,
> especially of this magnitude. This is obviously not a bug, and not a small
> feature request either...
the RFC is already in the wiki, AFAIR it is linked from the ticket also.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax
h
Someone actually just pointed out to me that if(-1) returns true. In
that case, I suppose my suggestion doesn't quite work.
The reason I suggest this is that I suspect people will constantly be
looking up what the constants are called.
On 12-01-28 11:17 AM, Justin Martin wrote:
Hello everyon
> There is no BC change here as session_status() has been added in the
> 5_4 branch as far as i can tell.
OK, fair enough, I didn't understand it was trying to get into 5.4.
-- S.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Sanford Whiteman
wrote:
>> I believe comparing the value against a constant, is always more
>> readable than wondering what "truthy" means. if(session_status() ===
>> PHP_SESSION_ACTIVE) is much self-documenting than the proposed change.
>
> ... also an obvious
> I believe comparing the value against a constant, is always more
> readable than wondering what "truthy" means. if(session_status() ===
> PHP_SESSION_ACTIVE) is much self-documenting than the proposed change.
... also an obvious BC break for anyone who was using the values
instead of the
Hi!
I'd like to suggest we change these values to
- PHP_SESSION_DISABLED = -1
- PHP_SESSION_NONE = 0
- PHP_SESSION_ACTIVE = 1
This way, one can do if(session_status()) to check if there is an active
session, rather than having to compare the result to a constant.
Any objections?
Hi!
I'm trying to upload the latest getters/setters patch to:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=49526
I get "Uploaded file is empty or nothing was uploaded."
Is there a problem or a file size limit? The patch file is 205k now.
BTW, I would recommend using Wiki and RFC for tracking new featur
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Justin Martin wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> For the result of session_status(), the corresponding constants for the
> sessions state are
>
> - PHP_SESSION_DISABLED = 0
> - PHP_SESSION_NONE = 1
> - PHP_SESSION_ACTIVE = 2
>
> I'd like to suggest we change these val
Hello everyone,
For the result of session_status(), the corresponding constants for the
sessions state are
- PHP_SESSION_DISABLED = 0
- PHP_SESSION_NONE = 1
- PHP_SESSION_ACTIVE = 2
I'd like to suggest we change these values to
- PHP_SESSION_DISABLED = -1
- PHP_SESSION_NONE = 0
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thank you for catching that. Please go ahead and commit!.
Thanks
On 01/28/2012 04:00 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> When I was just checking PHP 5.4 compatibility with Xdebug I ran
> into the case where zend_eval_string() no longer would
Hi David,
When I was just checking PHP 5.4 compatibility with Xdebug I ran into
the case where zend_eval_string() no longer would bail out when you'd
evalulate something that doesn't work (like a standalone
"$this->property;" without being in a class scope).
Xdebug has code (simplified) like t
18 matches
Mail list logo
