On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Laruence wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Nikita Popov
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Kris Craig wrote:
>>> "There'd be a minimum of 2 weeks between when an RFC that touches the
>>> language is brought up on this list and when it's voted o
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Laruence wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Nikita Popov
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Kris Craig wrote:
"There'd be a minimum of 2 weeks between when an RFC that touches the
>
Is this intentional?
buildconf: You need autoconf 2.59 or lower to build this version of
PHP. You are currently trying to use 2.68 Most distros have separate
autoconf 2.13 or 2.59 packages. On Debian/Ubuntu both autoconf2.13 and
autoconf2.59 packages exist. Install autoconf2.13 and set the
P
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Is this intentional?
>
> buildconf: You need autoconf 2.59 or lower to build this version of
> PHP. You are currently trying to use 2.68 Most distros have separate
> autoconf 2.13 or 2.59 packages. On Debian/Ubuntu both autoconf2.13
Am 29.04.2012 13:24, schrieb Gergo Erdosi:
> Yes, see Ramus' reply in an older thread:
> http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=131423346824759
I know that autoconf 2.13 is required for PHP 5.3 and that
autoconf 2.59 is required for PHP 5.4. But on Fedora 16 I only have the
choice between 2.13 and
Am 29.04.2012 13:44, schrieb Sebastian Bergmann:
> I know that autoconf 2.13 is required for PHP 5.3 and that
> autoconf 2.59 is required for PHP 5.4. But on Fedora 16 I only have the
> choice between 2.13 and 2.68 and it looks to me like we are running into
> the same problem again of not being co
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Am 29.04.2012 13:24, schrieb Gergo Erdosi:
> > Yes, see Ramus' reply in an older thread:
> > http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=131423346824759
>
> I know that autoconf 2.13 is required for PHP 5.3 and that
> autoconf 2.59 is required
On 28-04-12 06:27, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2012/4/27 Jille Timmermans:
I suggest we add a function boolval(). It simply converts the given argument
to a boolean, like strval(), intval() and floatval(). I already have an
implementation ready[1].
Why?
* It is missing in the current list of *v
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Jille Timmermans wrote:
> On 28-04-12 06:27, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
>
>> 2012/4/27 Jille Timmermans:
>>
>> I suggest we add a function boolval(). It simply converts the given
>>> argument
>>> to a boolean, like strval(), intval() and floatval(). I already ha
So, I've been reading articles for a decade now that say that readfile()
is great and wonderful except for memory usage. Specifically, that it
reads a file into memory entirely, and then prints it to stdout from
there. So if you're outputing a big file you will hit your memory limit
and kill
Hi,
Readfile() is internally implemented in the same way like fpassthru()
(actually the same backend function is called, readfile only opening a
stream before delegating to passthru). Both methods delegate from PHP
user-space to an internal streams API methods php_stream_passthru(). This
one has 2
> So, I've been reading articles for a decade now that say that readfile() is
> great and wonderful except for memory usage. Specifically, that it reads a
> file into memory entirely, and then prints it to stdout from there. So if
> you're outputing a big file you will hit your memory limit and k
12 matches
Mail list logo
