On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Patrick ALLAERT patrickalla...@php.net wrote:
Hi,
2012/4/12 Nikita Popov nikita@googlemail.com:
PS: I added isset() too, to address the consistency concerns mentioned on
IRC.
I would have voted +1 if it didn't contain the isset() change. None of
the
hi,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
so I think if you want to change empty, you should also change isset.
An expression is not set per se. isset goals, by design, from the very
1st day, is to test the existence of a variable and a variable only.
empty() on
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 13:27 +0800, Laruence wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Yader Hernandez
yader.hernan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Yader Hernandez
yader.hernan...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I was wondering how to create a new object from a function call?
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
so I think if you want to change empty, you should also change isset.
An expression is not set per se. isset goals, by design, from the very
hi,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
$foo=null;
var_dump(isset($foo)); //prints bool(false)
No offset meant, but it is totally expected and well known, and as far
as I remember documented too. Assigning NULL to a variable unsets it
(so to say).
empty()
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
$foo=null;
var_dump(isset($foo)); //prints bool(false)
No offset meant,
lapsus :) s,offset,offense,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye |
Pierre,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
$foo=null;
var_dump(isset($foo)); //prints bool(false)
No offset meant, but it is totally expected and well known, and as far
as I
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
$foo=null;
var_dump(isset($foo)); //prints bool(false)
No offset meant, but it is totally expected and well known, and as far
as I
On 5/1/2012 9:11 PM, Galen Wright-Watson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:45 AM, C.Koycan5...@gmail.com wrote:
As of 5.3.0 this bug does not exist for function names. Only classes and
interfaces.
Turns out, if you cause a function to be called dynamically by (e.g.) using
a variable
Anyone have any help with this?
$1 of the first T_ISSET is matching against \n\t\tisset {... (... being the
rest of the set body through to the end of the script.
-Original Message-
From: Clint Priest [mailto:cpri...@zerocue.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:41 PM
To:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:23 AM, C.Koy can5...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/1/2012 9:11 PM, Galen Wright-Watson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:45 AM, C.Koycan5...@gmail.com wrote:
As of 5.3.0 this bug does not exist for function names. Only classes and
interfaces.
Turns out, if you cause a
On 05/01/2012 11:40 AM, Larry Garfield wrote:
On 5/1/12 10:01 AM, Paul Reinheimer wrote:
Hi All,
Unfortunately, you've ignored Uwe's e-mail... The problem is not the
PHP
version; the problem is that you're buffering unlimited amounts of
data.
Check your configuration and make sure
hi Anthony,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
I voted for the ability to use an expression for isset() as well,
since I agree with Ferenc, it's a matter of consistency. Sure, the
use-case for isset() is definitely weaker than for empty(),
No, it is
13 matches
Mail list logo