Hi!
As Stas suggested earlier, it would help if you can convince one
person having voted none or both to choose the empty only option, then
you should be good. It is not that good in general, but for 1/3 of a
voice for something like that ... :)
AFAIK 2 of the people voting both (myself
Hi!
The PHP group is totally irrelevant in this process, with all due
respect. It is about php.net developers.
Which is what I meant - most of the developers (or committers) did not
vote at all.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext.
Stas Malyshev wrote:
The PHP group is totally irrelevant in this process, with all due
respect. It is about php.net developers.
Which is what I meant - most of the developers (or committers) did not
vote at all.
Or simply don't have voting rights ...
Personally I would prefer to see
Hi!
Or simply don't have voting rights ...
Personally I would prefer to see 'empty()' remain limited to real variables.
AFAIK all committers have voting rights on wiki.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
--
PHP Internals - PHP
hi Stas,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
As Stas suggested earlier, it would help if you can convince one
person having voted none or both to choose the empty only option, then
you should be good. It is not that good in general, but for 1/3 of
Hi
I have a proposal to add a new function to ext/standard: array_part():
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_part
Comments would be very welcome, especially the constructive kind.
Please keep this on topic. In particular, avoid proposing new syntax as
I'm not interested in that. You can of
Can you please add some code examples on the RFC, that get outputted as
pre tags.
Ideally demonstrating var_dump() output to inspect the return value of your
new function to get a clear indication of the input, and resulting output.
- Paul.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Gustavo Lopes
On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:26:11 +0200, Paul Dragoonis dragoo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can you please add some code examples on the RFC, that get outputted as
pre tags.
Ideally demonstrating var_dump() output to inspect the return value of
your
new function to get a clear indication of the input,
Pierre,
AFAIK 2 of the people voting both (myself included) already said they
are OK with empty only.
If the other one can raise his voice, then we are good.
I had meant to reply to the list, but I had replied to Stas directly.
I would be happy to change my vote from isset() and empty() to
Sorry, I comprehend neither the cause nor the effect in your argument
statement. Can you please elaborate?
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Clint Priest cpri...@zerocue.com wrote:
This has already been covered quite a bit, the problem with your
suggestion is that the compiler needs to
Hey,
Am i correct in assuming this is basically substr() for arrays.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.ptwrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:26:11 +0200, Paul Dragoonis dragoo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can you please add some code examples on the RFC, that get
Hi there,
The recent suhosin 'discussions' and subsequent browsing of various
mailing lists prompted me into looking at doing some core
development/bug fixing/whatever, since I have a vested interest as a
user.
I had a look around the various php.net sites but didn't really find
much in the way
On Mon, 14 May 2012 13:23:27 +0200, Paul Dragoonis dragoo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Am i correct in assuming this is basically substr() for arrays.
No. That's a part of it. It also does indexes as keys (like array_slice)
and multidimensional arrays, none of which have anything analogous in
Hi,
Not quite. The proposed is a syntactic sugar which is thought to handle any
transformation of a value, not necessarily or limited to type or class
conversion. It is of course possible to limit the usage to just that, with
any user defined convention or best practice. In fact it's pretty
hi Gustavo,
I would add some examples inline in the RFC, with explanation, to ease
the comprehension of this new function and its possibility. The
current RFC is somehow hard to digest :)
Cheers,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Miah Gregory m...@darksilence.net wrote:
Hi there,
The recent suhosin 'discussions' and subsequent browsing of various
mailing lists prompted me into looking at doing some core
development/bug fixing/whatever, since I have a vested interest as a
user.
I had
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
hi Gustavo,
I would add some examples inline in the RFC, with explanation, to ease
the comprehension of this new function and its possibility. The
current RFC is somehow hard to digest :)
Yes, that's what I was
On Mon, 14 May 2012 15:41:25 +0200, Paul Dragoonis dragoo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Gustavo, why would I use array_part() if I could use array_slice() to get
the parts of an array between two offsets.
Obviously, if you want to do something that array_slice() already does,
then you wouldn't
Both of the RFC's you reference are for casting TO a scalar, not TO an object
type. Your pastbin is for casting FROM a scalar TO an object.
-Original Message-
From: Seva Lapsha [mailto:seva.lap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 6:18 AM
To: Clint Priest
Cc:
My pastbin is for casting anything to anything.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Clint Priest cpri...@zerocue.com wrote:
Both of the RFC's you reference are for casting TO a scalar, not TO an
object type. Your pastbin is for casting FROM a scalar TO an object.
-Original Message-
Hi!
Not quite. The proposed is a syntactic sugar which is thought to handle
any transformation of a value, not necessarily or limited to type or
class conversion. It is of course possible to limit the usage to just
that, with any user defined convention or best practice. In fact it's
pretty
Hi!
I had a look around the various php.net sites but didn't really find
much in the way of guidelines to get involved, code wise, or suggestions
as to low hanging fruit that wouldn't be too painful to start on. If
someone could point me in the right direction it would be much
appreciated.
Thanks.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
Not quite. The proposed is a syntactic sugar which is thought to handle
any transformation of a value, not necessarily or limited to type or
class conversion. It is of course possible to limit the
I am interested in preserving the complete PHP context for a thread (globals,
variables, interpreter, etc.--everything) for later access from a different
thread.
What would be involved in this? It seems like:
1) Avoid calling ts_free_thread
2) Call tsrm_set_interpreter_context from new
How would one use your Castable interface to cast a Class Test to any of
integer, array or boolean?
From: Seva Lapsha [mailto:seva.lap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 12:19 PM
To: Clint Priest
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Custom Casting
My pastbin is for
Please read my previous comment.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Clint Priest cpri...@zerocue.com wrote:
How would one use your Castable interface to cast a Class “Test” to any
of integer, array or boolean?
** **
*From:* Seva Lapsha [mailto:seva.lap...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, May
Hi All,
Trying to ready myself for some possible work w/the core (after I
resurrect all my never-that-great C, heh), I went looking for a recent
book. (I still like old-school supplements.)
I see Sara's from 2006 on Amazon, but nothing after that under 'PHP
internals'. I'm sure that one's not
27 matches
Mail list logo
