On 07/26/2012 11:36 PM, Alex Aulbach wrote:
1) The bigger the language grows, the more we need to think about how
to implement new features.
I think it's a bad argument to say we made this and that not so
ideal, so we can make this also. Don't be so idealistic. :)
I think it's a duty to make
Hi Edward,
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Edward Z. Yang ezy...@mit.edu wrote:
From: Edward Z. Yang ezy...@mit.edu
Functionality is not included for other SAPIs because they either do not
support .user.ini (e.g. CLI) or they serve multiple requests and thus
do not support dl() (e.g.
Excerpts from Pierre Joye's message of Sat Jul 28 02:20:51 -0400 2012:
Functionality is not included for other SAPIs because they either do not
support .user.ini (e.g. CLI) or they serve multiple requests and thus
do not support dl() (e.g. FastCGI).
dl has been disabled in FastCGI and
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Edward Z. Yang ezy...@mit.edu wrote:
Excerpts from Pierre Joye's message of Sat Jul 28 02:20:51 -0400 2012:
Functionality is not included for other SAPIs because they either do not
support .user.ini (e.g. CLI) or they serve multiple requests and thus
do not
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, I can split in two. Does PHP use pull requests?
Yes, via github's php mirror, see https://wiki.php.net/vcs/gitworkflow
https://github.com/php/php-src
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net |
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I don't think this generator question is any different. We need to
explain generators in the simplest way possible. The simplest way to
explain generators is to not even worry about them being generators at
all. Simply say that functions can now return arrays one element at
On 07/27/2012 11:59 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I don't think this generator question is any different. We need to
explain generators in the simplest way possible. The simplest way to
explain generators is to not even worry about them being generators at
all. Simply say that
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I don't think this generator question is any different. We need to
explain generators in the simplest way possible. The simplest way to
explain generators is to not even worry about them being generators at
all. Simply say that functions can now return arrays one element at
On 07/28/2012 12:37 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I don't think this generator question is any different. We need to
explain generators in the simplest way possible. The simplest way to
explain generators is to not even worry about them being
generators at
all. Simply say
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 22:07 +0200, Anatoliy Belsky wrote:
after working for some time with the PHP test suite I've realized - it
needs an improvement of a special kind. What I'm talking about is the
server based testing. Very urgent cases have shown them up working
with APC. Most of the
Em Sat, 28 Jul 2012 01:40:33 +0200, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com
escreveu:
ps2: I think there would be still one hiccup in the code: afair we didn't
handled the case when a CDATA closure happens to be in the test output,
that could be handled by
On 07/28/2012 07:09 AM, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 22:07 +0200, Anatoliy Belsky wrote:
after working for some time with the PHP test suite I've realized - it
needs an improvement of a special kind. What I'm talking about is the
server based testing. Very urgent cases have
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
On 07/28/2012 07:09 AM, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 22:07 +0200, Anatoliy Belsky wrote:
after working for some time with the PHP test suite I've realized - it
needs an improvement of a special
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 10:08 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
For that I once created a special SAPI, which can also do
multi-threading:
https://github.com/johannes/pconn-sapi
http://schlueters.de/blog/archives/166-Testing-persistent-connection-and-thread-safety-features-in-PHP.html
On 07/28/2012 11:24 AM, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 10:08 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
For that I once created a special SAPI, which can also do
multi-threading:
https://github.com/johannes/pconn-sapi
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Derick Rethans der...@derickrethans.nlwrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Ondřej Surý wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 13:37, Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011, Derick wrote:
I know it doesn't; I was asking for making it detectable.
Thanks for encouraging me on this idea. I'm putting it on my list then.
Will check for what Johannes did as it possibly could be combined with the
existing stuff.
And if someone is also interested on adding this feature - so much the
better, just drop me a line :)
Am Sa, 28.07.2012, 20:33
Is this RFC outdated?
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/jsonable
We have JsonSerializable in 5.4 - this appears to be essentially the same thing?
(Should it be moved from draft to implemented, or should it just
be removed? It was not implemented with the names used in this RFC.)
I was also looking at
18 matches
Mail list logo
