Hi there,
In the Implict isset in ternary operator thread, the idea of a special
version of the ternary operator with an isset implied was proposed. I
don't like this idea very much, but from that I want to suggest some
sort of default operator.
On IRC I had a little discussion about it
Hi,
As most of you know, the current php interactive shell is pretty much
useless without compiling php --with-readline, but for the most users this
the first impression what they experience (eg. using the php interactive
shell without readline support).
There is an alternative readline
Well, I saw it, and I say for a ~600 line library, why not?
Heck, we could maybe reimplement the readline extension with it.
On 04/08/12 20:49, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
As most of you know, the current php interactive shell is pretty much
useless without compiling php --with-readline, but for
Hi,
After the last discussion I've started about runkit which some of you
suggest to keep it in PECL - I thought about the extensions problem in
PHP and wish to ask for your opinion.
Many developers use shared hosting as PHP env which not allows them to
install new extensions in PHP.
In order to
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Yahav Gindi Bar g.b.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
We had dl() until it was deprecated, and even when we got it I guess that
administrators disabled the dl() method because of security reasons.
However, PECL got limited extensions which, as long as I know, does not put
On 04/08/12 21:03, Nikita Popov wrote:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Yahav Gindi Bar g.b.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
We had dl() until it was deprecated, and even when we got it I guess that
administrators disabled the dl() method because of security reasons.
However, PECL got limited extensions
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Yahav Gindi Bar g.b.ya...@gmail.com
wrote:
We had dl() until it was deprecated, and even when we got it I guess that
administrators disabled the dl() method because of security reasons.
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Yahav Gindi Bar g.b.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After the last discussion I've started about runkit which some of you
suggest to keep it in PECL - I thought about the extensions problem in
PHP and wish to ask for your opinion.
Many developers use shared
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Andrew Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 04/08/12 21:03, Nikita Popov wrote:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Yahav Gindi Bar g.b.ya...@gmail.com
wrote:
We had dl() until it was deprecated, and even when we got it I guess that
administrators disabled the dl()
Hi!
Many developers use shared hosting as PHP env which not allows them to
install new extensions in PHP.
You do realize they do it not because they are evil people thriving on
suffering of their clients, but because they need controlled environment
they can maintain? If you need environment
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Yahav Gindi Bar g.b.ya...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
After the last discussion I've started about runkit which some of you
suggest to keep it in PECL - I thought about the extensions problem in
Yahav Gindi Bar wrote:
Shared hosting is cheap for a reason, and trying to cheat
shared hosters by changing PHP both wrong and pointless.
My wish is not to cheat using PHP but to give the shared hosting users
somehow the ability to enjoy from PECL packages without being restricted to
their
There is already a safe and sensible way to do this in a shared
hosting environment: the host installs pecl packages that everyone
gets, and only after verifying that they don't reduce the security of
the shared environment. Or, yes, just get a vps! Really, it's not
expensive anymore (:
On Sat,
13 matches
Mail list logo
