-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 02/12/2014 08:58, Remi Collet a écrit :
> Mostly for Dmitry
>
> After some work, I can reduce the failed tests number from 111 to 5
> :) (configure --disable-all)
>
> Those seems related to new mm. => munmap() failed: [22] Invalid
> argument
$ gd
Remi,
Any chance to have these fixes for 5.5/5.6 as well?
Kaplan
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 27/11/2014 13:39, Gustavo Frederico Temple Pedrosa a écrit :
> > Hi, internals!
> >
> > There are some PRs for supports
> On 1 Dec 2014, at 15:27, Remi Collet wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 01/12/2014 11:09, Remi Collet a écrit :
>> Notice: master on ppc64 seems in quite bad shape, we currently
>> have 111 failed tests (with ./configure --disable-all).
>
> 82 fixed
> 29 to wor
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> > On 1 Dec 2014, at 15:27, Remi Collet wrote:
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Le 01/12/2014 11:09, Remi Collet a écrit :
> >> Notice: master on ppc64 seems in quite bad shape, we currently
> >> have 111 f
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Rowan Collins
wrote:
> On 1 December 2014 22:28:04 GMT, Ralph Schindler
> wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Many of you know from reading the subject line whats coming next! ;)
> >
> >In php, after we interact with HTTP streams (as a client), PHP conjures
> >
> >into local
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 02/12/2014 11:01, Lior Kaplan a écrit :
> Remi,
>
> Any chance to have these fixes for 5.5/5.6 as well?
All failed tests (and fix) are master only
related to move to size_t and new mm.
The only 5.6 issue (pack/unpack) have be fixed in 5.6+
Remi.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 02/12/2014 11:11, Andrea Faulds a écrit :
> Would you mind revealing which tests failed? This might be
> important to me with bigints.
See my previous mail in this thread failed tests are attached, but
most are fixed (well, I haven't test any exte
> On 2 Dec 2014, at 10:34, Remi Collet wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 02/12/2014 11:11, Andrea Faulds a écrit :
>
>> Would you mind revealing which tests failed? This might be
>> important to me with bigints.
>
> See my previous mail in this thread failed te
Tom Samplonius wrote on 02/12/2014 05:01:
Wow, I had no idea that existed; what an incredibly ugly
implementation. Even the name is weird (why "header" singular when it
contains an array of headers?)
Actually, no. HTTP responses contain a single header at the
protocol level, but contain
Lior,
Remi performed the tests and I'm correcting now the errors.
The PR #737 was closed and the PR #922 was merged :)
Thanks.
> From: Lior Kaplan [mailto:lio...@zend.com]
> Sent: terça-feira, 2 de dezembro de 2014 08:01
> To: Remi Collet
> Cc: Gustavo Frederico Temple Pedrosa; PHP Internals
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With latest commit (Thanks dmitry) test suite in ppc64 is now OK.
Remi.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlR9vY8ACgkQYUppBSnxahixCwCfbnQmf9/z6W17icpOErgJTOb
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Stanislav Malyshev
wrote:
> Hi Remi!
>
> I see that the test sapi/fpm/tests/015.phpt is randomly intermittently
> failing all the time in CI, making it harder to evaluate fixes. The
> cause of the failure is additional one or two messages like this:
>
> ERROR: unab
I'm going to commit this, if nobody objects.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> See the updated patch:
> https://gist.github.com/dstogov/08b545de6bf113113f58
> it can be safely applied again and simplifies inheritance code (thanks to
> Levi).
>
> The patch sa
Hi!
> where do you see this test failing?
> on travis, or somewhere else?
Yes, on Travis. Fails almost every other time.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@gmail.com
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Stanislav Malyshev
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > where do you see this test failing?
> > on travis, or somewhere else?
>
> Yes, on Travis. Fails almost every other time.
>
> --
> Stas Malyshev
> smalys...@gmail.com
>
interesting, I've checked out https://travis-ci.org/php/ph
interesting, I've checked out https://travis-ci.org/php/php-src/builds
before sending my mail, and looked into a couple of failed builds, but
couldn't find anything with this particular test.
As far as I can see, Remi already marked it as XFAIL.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Maili
2014.12.02. 20:57 ezt írta ("Maciej Sobaczewski" ):
>>
>> interesting, I've checked out https://travis-ci.org/php/php-src/builds
>> before sending my mail, and looked into a couple of failed builds, but
>> couldn't find anything with this particular test.
>>
>
> As far as I can see, Remi already ma
On Nov 27, 2014, at 10:34 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>> You are correct. Methods cannot be declared abstract if you have an
>> "abstract final". They must also be static. I added these checks together
>
> To me, it just feels a bit unnatural. So you have abstract class, which
> usually has ab
Good evening once again,
I’m putting the ZPP Failure on Overflow RFC to a vote. This RFC is an important
prerequisite to the Big Integer Support RFC, as it ensures safety in implicit
integer parameter conversions.
The RFC requires a 2/3 majority, and voting starts today (2014-12-02) and ends
i
hi Anatol!
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Anatol Belski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a long spoken topic which is now embodied in
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/native-tls . A preliminary implementation is
> there as well, thus we can discuss it.
Awesome work as usual!
As other mentioned, we should
20 matches
Mail list logo
