On 12.07.2018 at 09:06, Côme Chilliet wrote:
> Le jeudi 12 juillet 2018, 01:04:36 CEST Andrea Faulds a écrit :
>
>> Hmm. Returning null with no warning makes perfect sense for keys, since
>> null is not a valid key so there's no ambiguity, but for values it seems
>> problematic. On that ground I
Nope
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018, 21:10 Stanislav Malyshev, wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > - As I said earlier, this patch has already been tested against some
> > extremely tricky scenarios, so from a userland perspective it is safe for
> > inclusion. If you don't have confidence in something related to it,
> ple
Hi!
> In my opinion, these should be treated basically like unmaintained
> extensions, i.e. issue a call for maintainership. It seems to be
> appropriate to explicitly CC the listed maintainers, though.
>
> However, I would prefer to issue the calls for maintainership one by
> one, or more likel
Hi!
> - As I said earlier, this patch has already been tested against some
> extremely tricky scenarios, so from a userland perspective it is safe for
> inclusion. If you don't have confidence in something related to it, please
> write a test case and help out.
It sounds like you are talking abo
Hi!
> Well... it's not being voted on because, despite being six days till
> the originally planned feature freeze date, neither sponsor has opened
> a vote.
And I think it's a good thing. Both for selfish reasons (I haven't
actually have the time to read the proposal and the mail thread
properl
Hi!
> Ah, thanks, Nikita! Considering this, I'm not against delaying beta1
> for two weeks and having an alpha4, provided that we do not allow any
> new (i.e. not yet under discussion) RFC to target 7.3.
>
> Stas, what do you think?
Sorry for late answer, I've been behind my emails due to bein
Hi!
> Things which don't effect the language, but are more of a question of
> preference - e.g., the decision to name phpng as PHP 6 vs PHP 7 - or for
> that matter, deciding about a different release cadence. It's one thing to
That's one of the places where 50% or plurality vote would be
approp
On 03.07.2018 at 07:53, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Following up the proposal from Sara, I've made a patch to add dates to
> maintainership status in EXTENSIONS:
> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/3357
Thanks!
> I didn't touch SAPIs because it's not clear what to do with them (to me).
I do n
Christoph M. Becker wrote:
On 14.03.2017 at 19:57, Andrea Faulds wrote:
Since stdClass has no __set_state method, var_export() produces unusable
output if given an object of that class. I wrote a patch that would make
var_export() produce a cast to object instead, which could be evaluated
to ge
On 12.07.2018 at 10:10, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I think the problem is that there are cases where a 2/3 vote (or a vote at
> all) doesn't make sense. True, we didn't have too many of those in the
> past - but as we reform, I think it's important to take note of them.
> Things which don't effect the
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 7:38 AM Joe Watkins wrote:
> Zeev,
>
> > I think our voting rules are in need of a much thorough review than just
> pushing the limit to 2/3 - which also IMHO doesn't tackle the difference
> scenarios that exist out there.
>
> Agree, they need reform, but rather than tryin
Le jeudi 12 juillet 2018, 01:04:36 CEST Andrea Faulds a écrit :
> Hmm. Returning null with no warning makes perfect sense for keys, since
> null is not a valid key so there's no ambiguity, but for values it seems
> problematic. On that ground I've decided to change my vote to No for the
> value
12 matches
Mail list logo
