On 11/27/2018 8:26 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 2:20 PM Thomas Hruska
wrote:
On 11/26/2018 2:42 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
Hi internals,
When the silencing operator @ is used, the intention is generally to
silence expected warnings or notices. However, it currently also
Hello Internals,
I am withdrawing the array_change_keys() RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_change_keys
While I still believe that PHP is missing the ability to easily re-key an
array, I'm no longer convinced that this particular approach is the best
solution, nor do I currently have the time
On Tuesday, November 27, 2018 3:00:27 PM CST Levi Morrison wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:36 AM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> > Looks like fun!
> >
> > Would this also include allowing a return type of `static`, which would be
> > useful for the "Return the object that was invoked" case or
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 2:00 PM Levi Morrison wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:36 AM Larry Garfield
> wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, November 26, 2018 3:25:52 PM CST Levi Morrison wrote:
> > > I am happy to announce my latest RFC, [Covariant Returns and
> > > Contravariant Parameters][1], is
Supporting `static` return would come in handy to define interfaces for
immutable objects.
Em ter, 27 de nov de 2018 às 19:01, Levi Morrison escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:36 AM Larry Garfield
> wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, November 26, 2018 3:25:52 PM CST Levi Morrison wrote:
> > > I am
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:36 AM Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> On Monday, November 26, 2018 3:25:52 PM CST Levi Morrison wrote:
> > I am happy to announce my latest RFC, [Covariant Returns and
> > Contravariant Parameters][1], is open for discussion. If you do not
> > recognize those terms then
On Monday, November 26, 2018 3:25:52 PM CST Levi Morrison wrote:
> I am happy to announce my latest RFC, [Covariant Returns and
> Contravariant Parameters][1], is open for discussion. If you do not
> recognize those terms then hopefully the introduction coupled with the
> [examples][2] will help.
I can only say that I've been waiting for this feature for years and am
really looking forward to see it implemented, hopefully in 7.4.
Good job on the RFC, I wish you luck!
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 22:26, Levi Morrison wrote:
> I am happy to announce my latest RFC, [Covariant Returns and
>
Can't wait for it to happen!
Thank you for your work and fixing object type.
pon., 26 lis 2018 o 22:26 Levi Morrison napisał(a):
> I am happy to announce my latest RFC, [Covariant Returns and
> Contravariant Parameters][1], is open for discussion. If you do not
> recognize those terms then
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 2:20 PM Thomas Hruska
wrote:
> On 11/26/2018 2:42 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> > Hi internals,
> >
> > When the silencing operator @ is used, the intention is generally to
> > silence expected warnings or notices. However, it currently also silences
> > fatal errors. As
On 11/26/2018 2:42 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
Hi internals,
When the silencing operator @ is used, the intention is generally to
silence expected warnings or notices. However, it currently also silences
fatal errors. As fatal errors also abort request execution, the result will
often be a hard
11 matches
Mail list logo
