On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, at 3:25 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
> > On Feb 23, 2020, at 12:06 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020, at 2:39 AM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
> >>> On Feb 21, 2020, at 6:17 PM, Larry Garfield
> >>> wrote:
> >>> I'm totally on board for better value object
Mike Schinkel wrote:
On Feb 21, 2020, at 6:17 PM, Larry Garfield
wrote:
Separate visibility for internal and external access is a separate
matter. (Also potentially useful, but not part of the write-once
proposal at the moment.)
This just hit me, so I think I will mention it.
The
Nikita Popov wrote:
Hi internals,
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/5172 changes var_dump() to use
serialize_precision instead of precision to dump floating-point numbers.
Hi Nikita,
Thank you so much for doing this! I had wanted to do this for a long
time, and I actually implemented it
> On Feb 23, 2020, at 9:23 AM, Rowan Tommins wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> First, I'd just like to reiterate that I absolutely see benefits in this
> proposal, and am definitely not campaigning for it to be abandoned as a bad
> idea. Like with any proposal, we have to weigh those benefits against
Hi Paul,
I left this thread to settle a bit, because I felt we were going round
in circles a bit. I think there's some fundamental differences in
outlook that no amount of discussion is going to resolve, so I've
trimmed this reply to the more specific points.
On 20/02/2020 14:56, Paul M.
> On Feb 24, 2020, at 8:55 AM, Rowan Tommins wrote:
>
> As with typed properties, I wonder if there's a way we can introduce
Now you are talking! This gives me hope after my dejected last comment on the
list.
-Mike
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
> On Feb 23, 2020, at 12:06 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2020, at 2:39 AM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
>>> On Feb 21, 2020, at 6:17 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
>>> I'm totally on board for better value object support, so that's a good
>>> motive for me. The question I have is whether
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, at 7:55 AM, Rowan Tommins wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 23:18, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> > The with*() method style requires cloning the object. What happens to the
> > locked status of a set property if the object is cloned? Are they then
> > settable again, or do they
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, at 10:56 AM, Ben Ramsey wrote:
> > On Feb 24, 2020, at 10:52, Philipp Tanlak wrote:
> >
> >> Ben Ramsey schrieb am Mo. 24. Feb. 2020 um 17:21:
> >> > On Feb 23, 2020, at 03:12, Philipp Tanlak
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hey PHP Devs!
> >> >
> >> > Since the RFC to
Hi Johannes,
Thanks for continuing to evaluate the proposal.
Am I correct in thinking that your primary objection to ServerRequest is that
it is read-only? If so, do you have other objections beyond that? And if not,
please correct me.
Meanwhile, to respond to your comments ...
* * *
> On
> On Feb 24, 2020, at 10:52, Philipp Tanlak wrote:
>
>> Ben Ramsey schrieb am Mo. 24. Feb. 2020 um 17:21:
>> > On Feb 23, 2020, at 03:12, Philipp Tanlak wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey PHP Devs!
>> >
>> > Since the RFC to str_contains is now almost a week old and most of the
>> > discussion happened in
Ben Ramsey schrieb am Mo. 24. Feb. 2020 um 17:21:
> > On Feb 23, 2020, at 03:12, Philipp Tanlak
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey PHP Devs!
> >
> > Since the RFC to str_contains is now almost a week old and most of the
> > discussion happened in the initial discussion/proposal thread, I wasn't
> > sure if
> On Feb 23, 2020, at 03:12, Philipp Tanlak wrote:
>
> Hey PHP Devs!
>
> Since the RFC to str_contains is now almost a week old and most of the
> discussion happened in the initial discussion/proposal thread, I wasn't
> sure if everyone has seen it. Therefore I'd like to create this new email
>
On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 10:54 -0600, Paul M. Jones wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
>
> > What indication is there that this will be more successfull than
> > the
> > filter API?
>
> Fair question. While I can't say how successful (or not) ext/filter
> has been, I *can* say that the proposal does not
On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 23:18, Larry Garfield wrote:
> The with*() method style requires cloning the object. What happens to the
> locked status of a set property if the object is cloned? Are they then
> settable again, or do they come pre-locked?
>
> Neither of those seem good, now that I
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, 09:19 Rowan Tommins wrote:
> On 24 February 2020 03:26:19 GMT+00:00, Marco Pivetta
> wrote:
> >The solution is trivial: don't use cloning:
> >
> >final class Foo
> >{
> >public function withBar($bar):self {
> >$instance = new self();
> >$instance->foo =
On 24 February 2020 03:26:19 GMT+00:00, Marco Pivetta
wrote:
>The solution is trivial: don't use cloning:
>
>final class Foo
>{
>public function withBar($bar):self {
>$instance = new self();
>$instance->foo = $foo;
>// more assignments here - unavoidable
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
