On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> Personally I favor #[] myself, but there has been a vote with a
> substantial participation choosing @@. Overturning this democratic
> outcome should require **significant** technical arguments, otherwise
> this RFC would provide problematic preced
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> I think it has become clear that we need to revisit this syntax question
> again, including the elephpant in the room of delaying this feature to 8.1.
>
> The reason is not only Joe's desire to revote on #[], but also that there
> are now more syntax
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 10:06 AM Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
>
> > Personally I favor #[] myself, but there has been a vote with a
> > substantial participation choosing @@. Overturning this democratic
> > outcome should require **significant** technical a
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 13:30, Сергей Пантелеев
wrote:
> Thanks, Peter!
>
> PR was merged.
>
> Now, should we use https://edit-new.php.net/ or edit php.net zone like
> that (
> https://github.com/saundefined/systems/commit/955c6145933b59a67237c5257766aa1ff5ee225c
> )?
>
Neither, not until the edi
I am happy to volunteer, but I'm unsure what needs to be done, and I may
need help. :/
Tiffany
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020, 3:53 PM Peter Cowburn wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 13:30, Сергей Пантелеев
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Peter!
>>
>> PR was merged.
>>
>> Now, should we use https://edit-new.php.
>
> > On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 13:30, Сергей Пантелеев
> > wrote:
> > Neither, not until the edit-new box is up and running smoothly.
> > Volunteers to make that happen are welcome.
>
I am also happy to volunteer, just tell me what needs to be done.
Regards
FF officially hits on Tuesday, so here's the status of the repo:
IF YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS IS INCLUDED IN THE TO: FIELD, THEN YOU HAVE HOMEWORK
ATTACHED.
RFCs still in voting phase:
* StackFrame class: This seems poised to fail, so no action needed.
* Phar Metadata unserialization: This is poised to o
Theodore Brown wrote:
>
> The Shorter Attribute Syntax RFC explicitly mentioned that the @@
> syntax would supersede the grouped attributes proposal: [1]
>From the RFC:
>
> # Unaffected Functionality
> ...it will supersede the syntax for grouped attributes.
I missed that change at least in part
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 10:11 AM Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2020, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
>
> > I think it has become clear that we need to revisit this syntax question
> > again, including the elephpant in the room of delaying this feature to
> 8.1.
> >
> > The reason is not only Joe'
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 4:40 PM Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> Theodore Brown wrote:
> >
> > The Shorter Attribute Syntax RFC explicitly mentioned that the @@
> > syntax would supersede the grouped attributes proposal: [1]
>
> From the RFC:
> >
> > # Unaffected Functionality
> > ...it will supersede the s
The main idea is to take control over objects creation and injecting
dependencies.
1. Some of them are provided through constructor (those, which could only
be retrieved right before instantiating our object).
2. Others are provided through `__inject` and PHP will inject all those
dependencies aut
Heya,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020, 05:32 3u93n3 wrote:
> The main idea is to take control over objects creation and injecting
> dependencies.
>
> 1. Some of them are provided through constructor (those, which could only
> be retrieved right before instantiating our object).
> 2. Others are provided thro
Re-writing with the internals ML in CC
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020, 06:16 3u93n3 wrote:
> > 2. Setter injection (as well as property injection, and also the
> proposed `__inject`) leads to temporal coupling smells. Explained
> otherwise, your object instances are not "functioning" right after
> instanti
On 03/08/2020 04:31, 3u93n3 wrote:
The main idea is to take control over objects creation and injecting
dependencies.
Hi 3u93n3,
Thank you for the effort. However, it is generally accepted that this
kind of functionality belongs to userland rather than the core.
There are a few issues with t
I'll be happy to help too
wbr,
Sergey Panteleev
On 3 Aug 2020, 00:30 +0300, Peter Cowburn , wrote:
>
> Neither, not until the edit-new box is up and running smoothly. Volunteers
> to make that happen are welcome.
15 matches
Mail list logo