>> Le 12 août 2020 à 20:19, Luis - SoftSAT Sistemas
>> a écrit :
>>
>> In the effort to make PHP a better language i want to ask why not "fix"
>> nested functions as suggested in
>> (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/true-nested-function-support) or block their usage?
>> The current behavior is a lot
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:08 PM Rowan Tommins wrote:
>
> On 12 August 2020 19:03:02 BST, Jakob Givoni wrote:
> >> > Is
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > on it's own an error?
> >>
> >> Yes. Basically this is an example of valid code in PHP 7 that will
> >> break if @[] is adopted.
> >
> >Wow, that was
On 12 August 2020 19:03:02 BST, Jakob Givoni wrote:
>> > Is
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > on it's own an error?
>>
>> Yes. Basically this is an example of valid code in PHP 7 that will
>> break if @[] is adopted.
>
>Wow, that was unexpected. By what logic?
>Also, how long must I wait before I can put a sem
> Le 12 août 2020 à 20:19, Luis - SoftSAT Sistemas
> a écrit :
>
> In the effort to make PHP a better language i want to ask why not "fix"
> nested functions as suggested in
> (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/true-nested-function-support) or block their usage?
> The current behavior is a lot unexpe
In the effort to make PHP a better language i want to ask why not "fix" nested
functions as suggested in
(https://wiki.php.net/rfc/true-nested-function-support) or block their usage?
The current behavior is a lot unexpected.
I am new here, sorry if it was already discussed, i can't find a good
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:03 PM Theodore Brown wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 7:26 AM Chris Riley wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 13:21, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 11 Aug 2020, Chris Riley wrote:
> > >
> > > > Quick question.
> > > >
> > > > What is the expected behaviour of
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 10:25 AM Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:48 AM Theodore Brown wrote:
>
> > It has just come to my attention that this RFC was rushed to vote
> > after less than the minimum two week period required after it was
> > brought up on list. Furthermore, discussi
On 12.08.20 17:25, Sara Golemon wrote:
Changing the syntax isn't a feature. It's a refinement. One of the things
our long release process provides is a chance to be absolutely certain
before we introduce syntax we'll come to regret later.
The current RFC does not discuss the BC breaks of each s
On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, Sara Golemon wrote:
> Maybe compromise on adding time to the vote end period so that the
> total is greater than 4 weeks?
You'd asked to get this done by beta3, which I miscalculated as being
tagged on August 25th. But as it's actually a week later I have no
problem extend
Den ons. 12. aug. 2020 kl. 18.29 skrev Paul M. Jones :
> It's premature. If we can't follow our own rules, why even have them?
Agreed
--
regards,
Kalle Sommer Nielsen
ka...@php.net
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
> On Aug 12, 2020, at 10:25, Sara Golemon wrote:
>
> If others agree that it's premature, we can stop the vote,
> but I'm not inclined to disrupt the process over such a small variance.
It's premature. If we can't follow our own rules, why even have them?
--
Paul M. Jones
pmjo...@pmjones.io
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:48 AM Theodore Brown
wrote:
> It has just come to my attention that this RFC was rushed to vote
> after less than the minimum two week period required after it was
> brought up on list. Furthermore, discussion was still very active at
> that time - I certainly didn't hav
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 3:41 AM Derick Rethans wrote:
>I've just opened the vote to make sure we don't make a terrible mistake
> with using the @@ syntax for attributes:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shorter_attribute_syntax_change#voting
>
> The vote ends August 23, 24:00 UTC.
It has just come t
On 11.08.2020 16:54, Sara Golemon wrote:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shorter_attribute_syntax_change#voting
> Just chiming in to say all, y'all voting for @[...] are making a terrible
> choice, and are you sure you're okay with it?
It looks like the community is split, and it might actually be a
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 6:26 PM Andreas Leathley wrote:
> On 11.08.20 18:07, Sara Golemon wrote:
> > Writing this on PHP 7 (or any earlier version for that matter) would be
> > valid syntax (ignored as a comment):
> >
> > #[SomeAttr(123)]
> > function someFunc() {}
> >
> > That's what's meant by
15 matches
Mail list logo
