Hi Mike,
> On Dec 21, 2020, at 7:38 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
>
> Would it be appropriate of me to ask for a section that discusses how that
> might be done in user space in the RFC, at least with some simple
> pseudo-code, or if is it non-trivial than a link to where it is discussed in
> dept
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 8:55 PM Sara Golemon wrote:
>
> You could do that now with a polyfill from userspace. If the annotation
> need not have an effect, then it's just any other userspace implementation.
>
It's possible now, while the attribute is not provided by PHP. But once it
gets introdu
Hello,
I'd like to open this for discussion.
Many times, I get this in the error logs:
/[20-Dec-2020 00:00:39 UTC] PHP Warning: POST Content-Length of
131279729 bytes exceeds the limit of 67108864 bytes in Unknown on line 0/
I'd like to give the suggestion to PHP developers to make it more u
>> tl;dr: Could add flags to is_array.
>
> Please, no.
>
> PHP needs fewer flags, not more.
>
> -Mike
lol - There’s something to be said for that.
Thinking of “simple" bridges that can be built toward a possible larger
discussion around naming and defining things and not adding more to the SL
> On Dec 22, 2020, at 8:22 AM, Josh Bruce wrote:
>
>
>> For example, with
>>
>> $a = ['foo', 'bar', 'baz’];
>>
>> `is_list()` will return `true`, but if you run `$a` through `asort()`,
>> `is_list()` will return `false` because the keys are no longer
>> consecutive integers, but is there a
The existing ArrayIterator has a large API surface. In most cases it
will duplicate the input array either out of ease of implementation or
as consequence of the API. Given that a significant use case for
ArrayIterator is to write generic code for Iterators that also work on
arrays, it is a pretty
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 12:35 PM Nicolas Grekas <
nicolas.grekas+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be great to allow adding this attribute on classes. What about
> allowing it right now and not bind it to any runtime side-effect? That
> would allow static analyzers to do their job. Same for consts
Hi Benjamin,
I have updated the RFC for a #[Deprecated] attribute that wasn't completed
> for PHP 8.0 due to time constraints and I am able to restart the discussion
> now.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecated_attribute
>
> The following updates have been made:
>
> - focus on only method and fu
Hi Levi,
> I want to re-iterate my opinion on this discussion thread: anything
> with a prefix is a hard-no from me. Namespaces are literally designed
> for this, and I will not vote "yes" to `iter_all`, `iterable_all`,
> etc, no matter what the prefix is. Anything without a namespace is a
> no fr
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 16:21, Larry Garfield wrote:
> That's why I am OK with most options except `iterable_`, because that's a
> lot of needless typing.
>
Whether the prefix is iterable or iter or just i, I'll always be typing
iany and hitting enter, letting my IDE do the leg work, avoiding any
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 1:24 PM tyson andre wrote:
>
> Hi internals,
>
> I've created a straw poll for the naming pattern to use for `*any()` and
> `*all()` on iterables.
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/any_all_on_iterable_straw_poll
>
> Background: The RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/any_all_on_iterable
Le 22/12/2020 à 16:27, tyson andre a écrit :
Hi Pierre,
This is the kind of reasoning I fully support usually, I do maintain a
few libraries for multiple PHP versions as most people in this list and
make things easily polifyllable is something I'm sensible to.
Nevertheless, the language and it
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020, at 9:27 AM, tyson andre wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> > This is the kind of reasoning I fully support usually, I do maintain a
> > few libraries for multiple PHP versions as most people in this list and
> > make things easily polifyllable is something I'm sensible to.
> >
> > Ne
Hi Go Kudo,
**A possible alternative that is widely used in other programming languages is
to limit the interface API to only generating bytes/integers,**
and to provide global functions that would use generic random number generator
objects (from internal or user-provided code) in their algorit
Hi Pierre,
> This is the kind of reasoning I fully support usually, I do maintain a
> few libraries for multiple PHP versions as most people in this list and
> make things easily polifyllable is something I'm sensible to.
>
> Nevertheless, the language and its standard library has to evolve at
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 16:05, tyson andre wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> >Hey Tyson,
> >
> > I know I'm being stubborn, but we have namespaces, but also an "old
> guard" that doesn't understand its own programming language 🤷♀️
>
> I assume it's a case of not liking them or assuming others wouldn't like
Thanks. I have edited the RFC based on your question.
> Method names: you don't need to emulate the conventions from non-OOP
code, e.g. string_shuffle() --> strShuffle and array_rand() -->
arrayRand(). Use a more naturally readable convention like shuffleString().
As mentioned in the RFC, it is i
Hi Marco,
>Hey Tyson,
>
> I know I'm being stubborn, but we have namespaces, but also an "old guard"
> that doesn't understand its own programming language 🤷♀️
I assume it's a case of not liking them or assuming others wouldn't like them
instead of not understanding them.
Namespaces for http
> For example, with
>
>$a = ['foo', 'bar', 'baz’];
>
> `is_list()` will return `true`, but if you run `$a` through `asort()`,
> `is_list()` will return `false` because the keys are no longer
> consecutive integers, but is there any doubt this is still a list?
> Maybe in a pure sense, it’s n
Fully agree with Marco
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020, 1:00 PM Marco Pivetta wrote:
> Hey Tyson,
>
> I know I'm being stubborn, but we have namespaces, but also an "old guard"
> that doesn't understand its own programming language 🤷♀️
>
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2020, 21:24 tyson andre wrote:
>
> > Hi internals
Hey Tyson,
I know I'm being stubborn, but we have namespaces, but also an "old guard"
that doesn't understand its own programming language 🤷♀️
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020, 21:24 tyson andre wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I've created a straw poll for the naming pattern to use for `*any()` and
> `*all()`
21 matches
Mail list logo
